B Mick's Spooky Time Dilation Puzzle

Click For Summary
Gravitational time dilation and orbital time dilation interact differently depending on altitude. In low Earth orbit, such as the ISS, time runs slower due to orbital speed, while at higher altitudes like GPS satellites, time runs faster because the altitude effect outweighs the orbital speed effect. The critical point where these effects balance occurs at an altitude of about 3200 km. Astronauts in geosynchronous orbit experience a net time dilation that does not cancel out. The discussion also touches on the philosophical implications of time as a continuous moment influenced by past and future events.
AtoMick-u235
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
Hmmm, , Does gravitational time dilation (speed up) cancel out earth orbit time dilation (slow down) for astronauts, , , it must do, to a certain extent

Hmmm, , ,Mick's been thinking = the present is a continuous but fleeting moment, that allows the future to flow into the past, , ,so does the past and future push and pull the present ?, , , SPOOKY !!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
AtoMick-u235 said:
Does gravitational time dilation (speed up) cancel out earth orbit time dilation (slow down) for astronauts, , ,
It depends on what altitude the astronauts are orbiting at. For low Earth orbit (such as the ISS), the slow-down due to orbital speed is greater than the speed-up due to increased altitude, so clocks on the ISS run slower than clocks on Earth.

At the altitude of the GPS satellites, however (orbital radius of 4.2 Earth radii), the opposite is true: the altitude effect outweighs the orbital speed effect so the natural rate of clocks on the GPS satellites is faster than that of Earth clocks (and so a frequency correction has to be applied to the GPS satellite clocks so that the output "tick rate" is the same as that of Earth clocks).

The break point between these two regimes is at an orbital radius of 1.5 Earth radii, or an altitude above Earth's surface of 0.5 Earth radii, or about 3200 km.
 
  • Like
Likes AtoMick-u235, hutchphd, vanhees71 and 4 others
No, GPS satellites need to account for -7 microseconds/day due to SR (motion) and +45 microseconds/day due to GR (gravity).

SO ... if an astronaut is in geosynchronous orbit, the answer is obviously no. You could probably find the one exact orbital path for which the difference is zero, but in general ... no.

EDIT: I see Peter beat me to it.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Dale
AtoMick-u235 said:
Mick's been thinking = the present is a continuous but fleeting moment, that allows the future to flow into the past, , ,so does the past and future push and pull the present ?, , , SPOOKY !!
Please review the PF rules on personal speculation. Your initial question was fine by itself.
 
Hello, everyone, hope someone will resolve my doubts. I have posted here some two years ago asking for an explanation of the Lorentz transforms derivation found in the Einstein 1905 paper. The answer I got seemed quite satisfactory. Two years after I revisit this derivation and this is what I see. In the Einstein original paper, the Lorentz transforms derivation included as a premise that light is always propagated along the direction perpendicular to the line of motion when viewed from the...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
58
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
58
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
737