B Mick's Spooky Time Dilation Puzzle

AtoMick-u235
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
Hmmm, , Does gravitational time dilation (speed up) cancel out earth orbit time dilation (slow down) for astronauts, , , it must do, to a certain extent

Hmmm, , ,Mick's been thinking = the present is a continuous but fleeting moment, that allows the future to flow into the past, , ,so does the past and future push and pull the present ?, , , SPOOKY !!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
AtoMick-u235 said:
Does gravitational time dilation (speed up) cancel out earth orbit time dilation (slow down) for astronauts, , ,
It depends on what altitude the astronauts are orbiting at. For low Earth orbit (such as the ISS), the slow-down due to orbital speed is greater than the speed-up due to increased altitude, so clocks on the ISS run slower than clocks on Earth.

At the altitude of the GPS satellites, however (orbital radius of 4.2 Earth radii), the opposite is true: the altitude effect outweighs the orbital speed effect so the natural rate of clocks on the GPS satellites is faster than that of Earth clocks (and so a frequency correction has to be applied to the GPS satellite clocks so that the output "tick rate" is the same as that of Earth clocks).

The break point between these two regimes is at an orbital radius of 1.5 Earth radii, or an altitude above Earth's surface of 0.5 Earth radii, or about 3200 km.
 
  • Like
Likes AtoMick-u235, hutchphd, vanhees71 and 4 others
No, GPS satellites need to account for -7 microseconds/day due to SR (motion) and +45 microseconds/day due to GR (gravity).

SO ... if an astronaut is in geosynchronous orbit, the answer is obviously no. You could probably find the one exact orbital path for which the difference is zero, but in general ... no.

EDIT: I see Peter beat me to it.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Dale
AtoMick-u235 said:
Mick's been thinking = the present is a continuous but fleeting moment, that allows the future to flow into the past, , ,so does the past and future push and pull the present ?, , , SPOOKY !!
Please review the PF rules on personal speculation. Your initial question was fine by itself.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
58
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
58
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
560
Back
Top