Microcanonical solution for three level system with (0, ε, ε)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter decahal
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the microcanonical solution for a three-level system characterized by energy states (0, ε, ε). The formula for the number of microstates is given by W = N!/(A!B!C!), and the entropy is expressed as S(E)/k = NlogN - AlogA - BlogB - ClogC. The author struggles to express variables A, B, and C solely in terms of total energy E, energy level ε, and particle number N, ultimately deciding to disregard B and C when differentiating W(E). The conversation suggests exploring specific cases with N = 3 and varying energy levels to better understand the microstate configurations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of statistical mechanics concepts, particularly microcanonical ensembles.
  • Familiarity with combinatorial mathematics, specifically permutations and factorials.
  • Knowledge of entropy calculations in thermodynamics.
  • Basic grasp of energy states in quantum systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation of the microcanonical ensemble in statistical mechanics.
  • Investigate combinatorial methods for counting microstates in multi-level systems.
  • Learn about entropy and its implications in thermodynamic systems.
  • Examine case studies involving three-level systems with varying particle numbers and energy distributions.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and students in statistical mechanics, physicists analyzing multi-level quantum systems, and anyone interested in the application of combinatorial methods to thermodynamic problems.

decahal
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Some particle has three states A,B,C. A has 0 energy while B and C both have same ε energy. Some system has N such particles. Find the number of possible states W(E) and express the entropy as a function of the total energy.
Relevant Equations
S=klogW
W = N!/(A!B!C!)

S(E)/k = NlogN - AlogA - BlogB- ClogC
I spent a lot of time but find it impossible to arrange the equation to express all A, B, C in terms of only E and ε and N, which is usually how you solve two level systems.
I just gave up and said B and C is completely unrelated to the total energy E so when I partial diff the W(E) I just ignore the last two terms.
Anyone with any insights whether that's the right way to do it?
Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
To get a feel for the problem, it can help to consider a few simple cases.

Suppose the number of particles is N = 3 and let the energy of the system be E = 2ε.
One possible microstate is (A, B, B) which means particle 1 is in state A, particle 2 is in state B, and particle 3 is also in state B. List all the other possible microstates for this energy E. What is W(E) for this example?

Try N = 3 and E = ε. Then you could try N = 4 and E = 2ε. This might help to see how to think about the number of microstates for arbitrary N and for arbitrary E = mε where m is an integer ≤ N.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K