Microcanonical solution for three level system with (0, ε, ε)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter decahal
  • Start date Start date
decahal
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Some particle has three states A,B,C. A has 0 energy while B and C both have same ε energy. Some system has N such particles. Find the number of possible states W(E) and express the entropy as a function of the total energy.
Relevant Equations
S=klogW
W = N!/(A!B!C!)

S(E)/k = NlogN - AlogA - BlogB- ClogC
I spent a lot of time but find it impossible to arrange the equation to express all A, B, C in terms of only E and ε and N, which is usually how you solve two level systems.
I just gave up and said B and C is completely unrelated to the total energy E so when I partial diff the W(E) I just ignore the last two terms.
Anyone with any insights whether that's the right way to do it?
Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
To get a feel for the problem, it can help to consider a few simple cases.

Suppose the number of particles is N = 3 and let the energy of the system be E = 2ε.
One possible microstate is (A, B, B) which means particle 1 is in state A, particle 2 is in state B, and particle 3 is also in state B. List all the other possible microstates for this energy E. What is W(E) for this example?

Try N = 3 and E = ε. Then you could try N = 4 and E = 2ε. This might help to see how to think about the number of microstates for arbitrary N and for arbitrary E = mε where m is an integer ≤ N.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top