Mid-Band Voltage Gain Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter DODGEVIPER13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gain Voltage
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the mid-band voltage gain expression (V0/Vi) for a circuit involving transistors and capacitors. The user initially calculated V0=gmVpi(Rc||Rl) and Vi=-Vpi((Ri+Rb||rpi)/(Rb||rpi)), but received feedback indicating errors in their approach. The correct mid-band gain was recalculated as V0/Vi = -gm(Rb||rpi)(Rc||Rl)/(Ri+Rb||rpi), yielding a numerical value of -39.531. The importance of incorporating the collector capacitor (50 pF) into the equivalent circuit is emphasized for accurate gain calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of transistor parameters such as transconductance (gm) and base-emitter voltage (Vpi).
  • Familiarity with circuit analysis techniques, particularly the use of equivalent circuits.
  • Knowledge of parallel and series resistance calculations (Rc||Rl, Rb||rpi).
  • Basic concepts of AC analysis in electronic circuits, including mid-band frequency considerations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of voltage gain in common-emitter amplifier configurations.
  • Learn about the impact of capacitors on frequency response in transistor circuits.
  • Research the significance of beta (β) in transistor operation and circuit design.
  • Explore practical applications of mid-band gain calculations in amplifier design.
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and professionals involved in analog electronics and amplifier design will benefit from this discussion.

DODGEVIPER13
Messages
668
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Problem picture is attached also some of my work is attached.
The problem states derive midband voltage gain v0/vi expression in terms of circuit parameters. From the expression you just derived calculate numerically the midband gain value?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I really only need help with part b finding the mid band voltage gain. So far I have V0=gmvpi(Rc||Rl) and vpi=-Vs((Rpi/(Ri+(Rb||Rib))). Then Vo/Vi = voltage gain but my professor told me I was wrong how should I proceed? I have also uploaded my work for a and shown some of b
 

Attachments

  • Capture2.PNG
    Capture2.PNG
    39.3 KB · Views: 1,199
  • Capture3.PNG
    Capture3.PNG
    30.5 KB · Views: 1,739
Physics news on Phys.org
Your high-pass corner frequency calculation is correct: 3.2 Hz.

The mid-band gain is when you assume the input capacitor → ∞ but without the 50 pF collector capacitor hooked up.

You won't ever get the rolloff frequency if you don't incorporate the collector 50 pF capacitor in your equivalent circuit.

I dn't have time to figure out where you went wrong in your computation of Vout/Vin. Maybe tomorrow. Offhand your Vπ calculation looks strange.
 
Ok I recalculated the gain V0=gmVpi(Rc||Rl) and Vi=-Vpi((Ri+Rb||rpi)/(Rb||rpi)) so V0/Vi = -gm(Rb||rpi)(Rc||Rl)/(Ri+Rb||rpi) = -39.531
 
DODGEVIPER13 said:
Ok I recalculated the gain V0=gmVpi(Rc||Rl) and Vi=-Vpi((Ri+Rb||rpi)/(Rb||rpi)) so V0/Vi = -gm(Rb||rpi)(Rc||Rl)/(Ri+Rb||rpi) = -39.531

If that's your mid-band gain it's way off.

To get an approximate idea of the gain (the input capacitor shorted and the collector capacitor gone), imagine a small voltage change ΔVi. Now, ΔVi is almost equal to ΔVb and ΔVb is almost equal to ΔVe. So the emitter current change is ~ (0-ΔVi)/RE ~ collector current change which is Δvc/RL + Δvc/Rc. Now solve for Δvc/Δvi & what do you get?

Sorry, I don't have the time to check your math. Maybe someone else will.
 
Ok so I know you don't have much time but does this sound ok for my approach. Ic=beta(Ib) and Ie=(1+beta)Ib so Ie=.906 mA, Ic=0.9 mA, and Ib=.006 mA. Then deltaVi=-9.06 V and delta Vc=1.285 V so Vc/Vi=-0.1418 this seems off?
 
DODGEVIPER13 said:
Ok so I know you don't have much time but does this sound ok for my approach. Ic=beta(Ib) and Ie=(1+beta)Ib so Ie=.906 mA, Ic=0.9 mA, and Ib=.006 mA. Then deltaVi=-9.06 V and delta Vc=1.285 V so Vc/Vi=-0.1418 this seems off?

That number is right on the money. Good going!
 
If you ever get into this stuff professionally you will almost never use equivalent circuits. You will follow the sort of argument I offered. Basically one assumes beta goes to infinity, ib = 0 etc. A good circuit will never depend on the value of beta since it can vary all over the place even for the same type number, like 2N2222.

The exception might be integrated circuit designers who can assume well-matched transistor pairs due to proximity, common process, etc.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Ok man cool yah I don't plan too well if I do it will be a mixture of this and power maybe electric vehicles or something
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K