Mie theory azimuthal ange independance

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dustydude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving mathematically that the far field scattering amplitude in Mie scattering is dependent solely on the angle theta and not on the azimuthal component in spherical coordinates. The participant is conducting research on light scattering from micron-sized particles and seeks assistance in documenting this proof. The symmetry of the scattering problem is emphasized as a key factor in understanding this independence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Mie scattering theory
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates
  • Knowledge of far field scattering concepts
  • Mathematical proof techniques in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical derivation of Mie scattering equations
  • Study the role of symmetry in scattering problems
  • Explore resources on far field approximation in wave scattering
  • Review literature on light scattering from spherical particles
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in optics, physicists studying light scattering phenomena, and graduate students focusing on Mie scattering and its mathematical foundations.

dustydude
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Im doing a research degree and it is on light scattering (mie scattering) from mircon sized particles.

I need help finding out to prove mathematically that the far field scattering amplitude is only dependendent the angle theta and not the azimuthal component. (that is in normal spherical coordinates)

In most books it is just states that for a spherical particle the scattering is only theta dependent.

Any help is very much appriciated!
 
Science news on Phys.org
Mie scattering is the scattering of a plane wave by a spherical particle. Think about the symmetry of the problem, and that will help you understand.
 
I do understand that the symmetry of the problem. I get the symmetry for any chosen scattering plane in the direction of the incident wave

Its the mathematical proof i need to write down and to document.

Thanks for the reply. Any help is still appriciated.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
965
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K