Is it possible that the particle theory is wrong, and that only its assumption works? [This was really what I was asking in the preceding thread that I opened that the administrator took to be on philosophy or linguistics because some others took it that way. When I pointed out their error, which was to show they had gotten off of physics onto philosophy and linguistics, the administrator took it that it was I who brought up the off-physics topics, and closed the thread. Sure I mentioned philosophy and linguistics to show them that they had gotten off physics onto that. But the administrator did not understand what I was doing. I'm merely asking if it is possible that particle theory could be refuted and another theory take its place. If you answer, please stick to physics, and don't get off onto philosophy and linguistics.