Miller indices for hexagonal crystal systems

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of Miller indices for hexagonal crystal systems, specifically addressing the conversion from a four-index notation, such as [1234], to a three-index format. Participants highlight the convenience of using four indices to represent planes with similar symmetry due to the unique 120-degree angles between the a- and b- axes. The conversation emphasizes the redundancy of the third index, which corresponds to the reciprocal space "d*" axis, while the fourth index aligns with the c-axis. A suggested resource for derivation is the German Wikipedia page on Miller indices.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Miller indices in crystallography
  • Familiarity with hexagonal crystal systems
  • Basic knowledge of vector components in physics
  • Awareness of reciprocal space concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Miller indices from the German Wikipedia page on Miller indices
  • Explore the relationship between reciprocal space and Miller indices
  • Learn about the geometric properties of hexagonal crystals
  • Investigate vector-component methods for crystallography
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in materials science, crystallography, and solid-state physics, particularly those seeking to deepen their understanding of Miller indices and hexagonal crystal structures.

Mind----Blown
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, to find the draw the direction for a given miller index say, [1234] we first convert this miller index consisting of 4 indices into one containing 3 indices.
To do so, we have a set of formulae prescribed in almost every book. Sadly I haven't been able to come across a single book the gives the derivation of those formulae!
I thought that i could use vector-component method to get the results but that gives totally weird formulae not even close to the ones i see in my textbooks. (have a look at the attached image)

So, can anyone suggest me a textbook, a link or anything that can help me understand the derivation? I'm not finding the enthusiasm for rote-memorising the formulae if i don't know where they come from...

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2.png
    Screenshot_2.png
    10.1 KB · Views: 2,013
Physics news on Phys.org
The 4 Miller indices often used with hexagonal crystals are just a convenience. The 3rd index can be dropped. 4 indices are used to make planes with the same symmetry also "look alike" in the 4-notation.
The physical reason is that the a- and b- axes form a 120 degree angle. There is a third axis within the basal plane that has the exact same symmetry. You get this axis, let's call it "d", by rotating the b-axis by another 120 degrees. So instead of using a and be as basis vectors, you could just as well use b and d, or d and a. Absolutely nothing would change, as the 120 degree rotation is the defining feature of a hexagonal crystal.
The redundant 3rd Miller index corresponds to the reciprocal space "d*" axis. The 4th index is along the c-axis.
 
M Quack said:
The 4 Miller indices often used with hexagonal crystals are just a convenience. The 3rd index can be dropped. 4 indices are used to make planes with the same symmetry also "look alike" in the 4-notation.
The physical reason is that the a- and b- axes form a 120 degree angle. There is a third axis within the basal plane that has the exact same symmetry. You get this axis, let's call it "d", by rotating the b-axis by another 120 degrees. So instead of using a and be as basis vectors, you could just as well use b and d, or d and a. Absolutely nothing would change, as the 120 degree rotation is the defining feature of a hexagonal crystal.
The redundant 3rd Miller index corresponds to the reciprocal space "d*" axis. The 4th index is along the c-axis.
yes, i get that but still, how do we arrive at those formulae?
i tried using vectors and their components method but it doesn't work
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K