Minimizing the voltage drop across a capacitor (solution shown)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the derivation of the equation V1 = V0 - V2 in the context of capacitors in series. The user seeks clarification on how this equation is formulated and why V3 is not considered in the calculation. It is emphasized that the total potential difference remains constant, leading to the relationship V0 = V1 + V2. The conversation also hints at the relevance of Kirchhoff’s laws in analyzing the circuit. Overall, the focus is on grasping the voltage relationships in capacitor circuits.
Sunwoo Bae
Messages
60
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Shown in the text
Relevant Equations
Q = CV

capacitors in series
capacitors in parallel
The following is the question and the solution to the question.
1643444698737.png


I understand the solution to the part where you find the Ceq and derive Qeq from the equation Q = Ceq*V.
However, I do not understand where V1 = V0-V2 come from.
When calculating the minimum voltage, how do you come up with the equation V1 = V0-V2, and why is V3 not taken to account?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sunwoo Bae said:
I do not understand where V1 = V0-V2 come from.
given and total potential difference is always same.
Here given potential difference is ##V_0## and total potential difference is ##V_1+V_2##

So ##V_0=V_1+V_2##
 
Sunwoo Bae said:
Homework Statement:: Shown in the text
Relevant Equations:: Q = CV

capacitors in series
capacitors in parallel

The following is the question and the solution to the question.
View attachment 296217

I understand the solution to the part where you find the Ceq and derive Qeq from the equation Q = Ceq*V.
However, I do not understand where V1 = V0-V2 come from.
When calculating the minimum voltage, how do you come up with the equation V1 = V0-V2, and why is V3 not taken to account?
Are you familiar with Kirchhoff’s laws?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top