Minimizing the voltage drop across a capacitor (solution shown)

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the derivation of the equation V1 = V0 - V2 in the context of capacitors in series. The user seeks clarification on how this equation is formulated and why V3 is not considered in the calculation. It is emphasized that the total potential difference remains constant, leading to the relationship V0 = V1 + V2. The conversation also hints at the relevance of Kirchhoff’s laws in analyzing the circuit. Overall, the focus is on grasping the voltage relationships in capacitor circuits.
Sunwoo Bae
Messages
60
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Shown in the text
Relevant Equations
Q = CV

capacitors in series
capacitors in parallel
The following is the question and the solution to the question.
1643444698737.png


I understand the solution to the part where you find the Ceq and derive Qeq from the equation Q = Ceq*V.
However, I do not understand where V1 = V0-V2 come from.
When calculating the minimum voltage, how do you come up with the equation V1 = V0-V2, and why is V3 not taken to account?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sunwoo Bae said:
I do not understand where V1 = V0-V2 come from.
given and total potential difference is always same.
Here given potential difference is ##V_0## and total potential difference is ##V_1+V_2##

So ##V_0=V_1+V_2##
 
Sunwoo Bae said:
Homework Statement:: Shown in the text
Relevant Equations:: Q = CV

capacitors in series
capacitors in parallel

The following is the question and the solution to the question.
View attachment 296217

I understand the solution to the part where you find the Ceq and derive Qeq from the equation Q = Ceq*V.
However, I do not understand where V1 = V0-V2 come from.
When calculating the minimum voltage, how do you come up with the equation V1 = V0-V2, and why is V3 not taken to account?
Are you familiar with Kirchhoff’s laws?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
920
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K