Pushoam said:
The torque about an axis connected the contact points of rear wheels :
##\vec \tau = [\{l( \hat x + \hat y) + h \hat z\}\times m( -g \hat z - A \hat x)]
\\ = m[ (lg- hA)\hat y + ml ( -g \hat x + A \hat z )##
If you are using the definition ##\vec{\tau} = \vec r \times \vec F##, then ##\vec r## is the position vector of the force as measured from your chosen
point of origin. It appears that you are taking the origin at the point of contact of one of the rear wheels with the ground. It would be nice to clearly state the location of the origin.
It appears that you have chosen your frame of reference to be moving with the car, so one of your forces is the fictitious force associated with the acceleration. It would be nice to state your choice of reference frame.
Also, make sure you have included the torques due to all of the forces. Are there forces acting at the points of contact of the rear wheels with the ground?
It is not necessary to assume that the distance between the rear wheels is the same as the distance between the two axles.
EDIT: You can think of the car as trying to rotate about a fixed axis in the accelerating frame. For an object rotating about a fixed axis, you can calculate the torques as "force times lever arm" and then you don't need to consider torques about a
point of origin. So, you don't need to construct position vectors relative to a point. Instead, you just need to consider lever arms relative to an axis. The answer falls out very quickly this way. But, it's also a nice exercise to work it out using torques relative to an origin (point).