Minimum angular velocity of a point mass on a rotating rod

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rob2024
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a point mass attached to a rotating rod, focusing on the conservation of angular momentum and energy in a frictionless system. Participants are exploring the implications of tension in the rod and the forces acting on the mass as it moves.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the nature of tension in the rod and its direction, considering the implications of conservation laws. There is an exploration of net torque and its relationship to the forces acting on the system. The trajectory of the mass and the definition of "minimum angular speed" are also under discussion.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants raising questions about the forces involved and the definitions used in the problem. Some have suggested potential interpretations of the motion and the conditions affecting the mass, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the definition of "minimum angular speed" and how it relates to the trajectory of the mass, as well as the role of gravity in the system.

Rob2024
Messages
39
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
A point mass ##m## is moving on a circular horizontal path attached to a massless rod length ##l=50## cm. The other
end of the rod is attached to the pivot point ##O## on a infinitely long vertical rod. There is no friction
along the vertical rod.

When ##O## is held motionless, the rod makes an angle 20##^\circ## with the vertical direction.

If the pivot point ##O## is released and it falls on the rod without friction. What's the minimum angular speed of the mass during the subsequent motion?
Relevant Equations
Coonservation of angular momentum
Conservation of energy
Because the system has no friction, when the point mass falls, I think both angular momentum and energy are conserved. Further because the rod is massless, there cannot be a vertical force from mass on the rod. The difficulty is to determine the property of tension. It determines the subsequent motion of the point mass. I am not too sure where to go from here, It seems odd the tension in the rod is not along the rod. Is this a bad question?

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What can the net torque on the angled rod be? What does that tell you about the forces between the two rods?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rob2024
hmm there cannot be any net torque either, this implies the point mass cannot exert horizontal force on the rod. This means the point mass travels at constant horizontal velocity until the rod becomes horizontal. I think I see what's happening.
 
Rob2024 said:
hmm there cannot be any net torque either, this implies the point mass cannot exert horizontal force on the rod. This means the point mass travels at constant horizontal velocity until the rod becomes horizontal. I think I see what's happening.
What about gravity? Or did you just mean its horizontal component is constant?
 
haruspex said:
What about gravity? Or did you just mean its horizontal component is constant?
The component.
 
Rob2024 said:
The component.
Ok.
So what will be the trajectory of the mass, and up to what point?
The question asks for the "minimum angular speed". It’s not clear to me how they are defining that. I assume they mean "the minimum magnitude of the angular velocity about the vertical rod", whereas taking it literally you'd have to consider the curve of the path in 3D.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
13K