MHB Minimum Perimeter of a Trapezoid: Find R & P

  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Minimum Perimeter
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum area (R) and minimum perimeter (P) of a trapezoid with specific properties: parallel sides AD and BC, equal non-parallel sides AB and CD, and equal diagonals AC and BD measuring 15. A definitive proof for the maximum area is provided, confirming that R can be calculated using the trapezoid's dimensions. However, there is a claim that the initial answer for the minimum perimeter is incorrect, prompting a reevaluation of P. The participants engage in deriving the correct values for both R and P, emphasizing the geometric relationships involved. The thread highlights the importance of accurate calculations in geometric problems.
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
a trapezoid $ABCD,$ with $\overline {AD}// \overline {BC}, \overline {AB}=\overline {CD}$, and diagonal $\overline {AC}=15=\overline {BD}$
if R is its maximum area ,please find :
(1)R
(2)find its minimum perimeter P
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
$$(1)\quad R=\dfrac{225}{2}$$

$$(2)\quad P=30\sqrt2$$
 
greg1313 said:
$$(1)\quad R=\dfrac{225}{2}$$

$$(2)\quad P=30\sqrt2$$
your answers are correct ,please show your solution
 
I calculated the area and perimeter of a square with diagonals of 15 units.
 
First, I give a more definitive proof for the maximum area. Next, I show that the answer for minimum perimeter is wrong.
For any convex quadrilateral, the area is 1/2 the magnitude of the cross product of the diagonals. In this case $${225\over 2}|\sin(\theta)|$$
Here $\theta$ is the angle between the diagonals. This is obviously maximized when $\theta=\pi/2$. Note there are many different isosceles trapezoids with equal diagonals of 15 that attain this maximum area.

Next, consider the rectangle with vertices $A=(x_0,y_0)=(7.5\cos(\theta),7.5\sin(\theta))$, $B=(x_0,-y_0)$, $C=(-x_0,-y_0)$ and $D=(-x_0,y_0)$. The perimeter is then $p=30\cos(\theta)+4\sin(\theta)$. Thus $p$ can be arbitrarily close to 30 by choosing $\theta$ to be sufficiently close to 0. I believe, but can not prove, that any isosceles trapezoid with diagonals of 15 has perimeter at least 30, but no such trapezoid attains the minimum of 30.
Edit:
I feel a little foolish. This was definitely a case of the forest hiding the trees. In triangle $ABD$, $|AB|+|DA|>|BD|=15$. Similarly for the other two sides of the trapezoid. So the perimeter is strictly greater than 30.
 
Last edited:
Albert said:
a trapezoid $ABCD,$ with $\overline {AD}// \overline {BC}, \overline {AB}=\overline {CD}$, and diagonal $\overline {AC}=15=\overline {BD}$
if R is its maximum area ,please find :
(1)R
(2)find its minimum perimeter P
my solution :
 

Attachments

  • minimum of Perimeter.jpg
    minimum of Perimeter.jpg
    25.9 KB · Views: 139
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top