Minimum Thickness of Dielectric

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the minimum thickness of dielectric coating required to ensure that the electric field between a coaxial cable's inner wire and outer cylinder remains below its maximum value. The electric field is defined by the equation E = (Q/L)*(1/2*pi*e*p), where Q/L is the charge per unit length and p is the cylindrical distance. By applying Gauss' law, participants explore how to calculate the minimum permittivity (e) and the dielectric thickness (t) necessary to achieve this shielding effect, ensuring the electric field does not exceed its maximum value at p = (a+b)/2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of coaxial cable structure and function
  • Familiarity with electric fields and Gauss' law
  • Knowledge of dielectric materials and their properties
  • Basic calculus for manipulating equations involving permittivity and electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Calculate the electric field using Gauss' law for coaxial cables
  • Explore the properties of dielectric materials, focusing on permittivity
  • Investigate the relationship between dielectric thickness and electric field strength
  • Learn about capacitance calculations for coaxial cable arrangements
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physics students, and professionals involved in the design and analysis of coaxial cables and dielectric materials will benefit from this discussion.

iblackford
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1. Basically, we have coaxial cable with an inner wire of radius a,
perfectly conducting, straight and infinitely long, with radius a, surrounded by an outer hollow cylinder, also made
from perfectly conducting material, having inner radius b and outer radius c. The hollow cylinder functions as a
return wire, and is coaxial with the inner wire. If the space between the wires is air or vacuum, the electric field
between the inner and return wires is shown to be

E = (Q/L)*(1/2*pi*e*p)

where Q/L is the charge per unit length and  the cylindrical distance between the wires.
Suppose the ~E field cannot be allowed to reach values above the value it reaches in the middle of the arrangement,
where p = (a+b)/2
2 . This can be achieved by shielding the inner cable with a dielectric of permittivity e.
a) What is the minimum value of e and the minimum thickness of dielectric coating that will ensure that the field
is everywhere below its maximal value?
b) What is the capacitance per unit length of the resulting arrangement.

I'm not sure how to do the first part of the problem, I think I would sub in my p = a+b/2 into my first equation, but I'm not sure what to do from there. Any help would be highly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
iblackford said:
1. Basically, we have coaxial cable with an inner wire of radius a,
perfectly conducting, straight and infinitely long, with radius a, surrounded by an outer hollow cylinder, also made
from perfectly conducting material, having inner radius b and outer radius c. The hollow cylinder functions as a
return wire, and is coaxial with the inner wire. If the space between the wires is air or vacuum, the electric field
between the inner and return wires is shown to be
E = (Q/L)*(1/2*pi*e*p)
where Q/L is the charge per unit length and p the cylindrical distance between the wires.
Just use Gauss' law for a Gaussian cylinder of radius p:
\int E\cdot dA = \frac{q}{\epsilon_0}
Suppose the ~E field cannot be allowed to reach values above the value it reaches in the middle of the arrangement,
where p = (a+b)/2
2 . This can be achieved by shielding the inner cable with a dielectric of permittivity e.
a) What is the minimum value of e and the minimum thickness of dielectric coating that will ensure that the field
is everywhere below its maximal value?
The maximum field is the E determined in 1 where p = (a+b)/2. A dielectric of thickness t will reduce this by a factor \frac{1}{\epsilon}

from p=a to p = a+t. So work out the expression for E at p=a+t. The value of E from p=a+t decreases as 1/p.

AM
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K