MHB Minimum time required to cover distance, beginning and ending at rest

Fantini
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
267
Reaction score
0
This is problem 1.16 from Kleppner & Kolenkow's Introduction to Mechanics. I didn't know whether to post it here or pre-university math.

A sportscar, Fiasco I, can accelerate uniformly to $120$ mi/h in $30$ s. Its maximum braking rate cannot exceed $0.7g$. WHat is the minimum time required to go $\frac{1}{2}$ mi, assuming it begins and ends at rest? (Hint: A graph of velocity vs. time can be helpful.)

My thought process: Since it can accelerate uniformly to 120 mi/h in 30 seconds I've converted this to an acceleration of
$$\frac{120 \frac{\text{mi}}{3600 \text{ s}}}{30 \text{ s}} = \frac{1}{30} \frac{1}{30} \frac{ \text{mi}}{\text{s}^2} = \frac{1}{900} \frac{\text{mi}}{\text{s}^2}.$$
Since the maximum braking rate cannot exceed $0.7g$ then its maximum deacceleration cannot exceed $0.00609 \text{ mi}/\text{s}^2$. Assuming that it can deaccelerate at the maximum rate instantaneously, graphing the velocity vs. time as in the hint we'd have something like this:[desmos="-1,2,-1,2"]y=x;y=5-3x[/desmos]
Desmos's merely illustrative. The distance covered is the area of the triangle. Denoting the velocity it may achieve as $v_0$, the time taken to reach velocity $v_0$ as $t_0$ and the time taken for everything to occur as $t_1$, we can write a few relations. We know
$$\frac{v_0}{t_0} = \frac{1}{900} \frac{\text{mi}}{\text{s}^2},$$
$$\frac{v_0}{t_0-t_1} = - 0.00609 \frac{\text{mi}}{\text{s}^2},$$
$$\frac{v_0 t_1}{2} = \frac{1}{2} \text{ mi}.$$

Writing
$$v_0 = \frac{t_0}{900} \text{ and } v_0 = 0.7g (t_1-t_0) = \frac{t_0}{900}$$
we can obtain $t_0$ in terms of $t_1$ as
$$t_0 = \frac{0.7g t_1}{\frac{1}{900} + 0.7g}$$
and $v_0$ in terms of $t_1$ as
$$v_0 = \frac{0.7g t_1}{1 + 900 \cdot 0.7g}.$$
Combining these in the last equation we get
$$\frac{0.7g t_1^2}{1 + 0.7g} = 1 \text{ and } t_1 = \sqrt{ \frac{1}{0.7g}+ 900}.$$
This is approximately $t_1 \approx 33,7$ seconds. It feels right because the distance covered by the sportscar if it maintained uniform acceleration for $30$ seconds is exactly $\frac{1}{2}$ mile.

Is this correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This is a sloppy use of units and 0.006 mi/s2 is 1 g, not the maximal 0.7 g, but apart from that it is right.

Cross check: From 120 mi/h the car would need 7.8 seconds to stop, so we expect the car to accelerate for ~26 seconds. The last ~8 seconds are traveled at half the top speed (on average) to cross the distance the car would travel in 4 seconds with an ongoing acceleration.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top