Minkowski in 5-D: what is the fifth?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nomadreid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Minkowski
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of the fifth coordinate in the context of Minkowski 5-D space, particularly as it relates to deSitter space. Participants explore the implications of this coordinate and its representation, as well as the curvature properties of deSitter space compared to the ambient Minkowski space.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the physical representation of the fifth coordinate, v, in Minkowski 5-D space, noting that the other four coordinates correspond to measurable quantities.
  • Another participant asserts that deSitter space is a 4-dimensional submanifold of R^5, suggesting a geometric interpretation of the fifth coordinate.
  • A participant references string theory, proposing that the fifth coordinate could be viewed as a rolled-up spatial dimension, but seeks clarification on its meaning in the context of 5-D Minkowski space.
  • Concerns are raised about the apparent contradiction between the positive curvature of deSitter space and the negative curvature implied by the Minkowski metric.
  • One participant explains that the fifth coordinate is part of the embedding space and emphasizes the need to introduce coordinates specific to the manifold for physical descriptions.
  • A later reply expresses appreciation for the clarification provided by the example of the 2-sphere and its coordinates.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the physical significance of the fifth coordinate and the implications of curvature in deSitter space, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants do not fully resolve the relationship between the curvature of deSitter space and the Minkowski metric, nor do they clarify the specific nature of the fifth coordinate in measurable terms.

nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,773
Reaction score
256
In the equation for the Minkowski 5-D space in which deSitter space is embedded, I read the equation t^2 -x^2-y^2-z^2-v^2=-H^-2. What is v?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's the fifth coordinate. De-Sitter-space is a 4 dimensional submanifold of R^5, or I should say R^(1,4) I guess.
 
Yes, I know it's the fifth coordinate. The question was whether one can represent it as any measurable quantity, as the other four are (3 spatial and one time). In string theory, of course, it is a rolled-up tiny other spatial dimension, but is this what is meant when discussing the 5-D Minkowski space of which the deSitter space is a submanifold?
While I am at it, I am still puzzling how one gets a positive curvature out of deSitter space if the metric on the deSitter space is the same as on the ambient Minkowski space, which gives a negative curvature.
 
It is just the space that the manifold is embedded in. It is still a 4 dimensional manifold on which you have to introduce coordinates before you do physics on it. It's just easier to describe as a submanifold, but it still represents an ordinary 4 dimensional world.

Just like the 2-sphere is described by x^2+y^2+z^2=1. There are three coordinates in the embedding space, but in the end you just introduce two coordinates to describe the manifold you are interested in, for example phi and theta. It doesn't make much sense to me to ask what "z" is "representing" in this case.
 
Thanks. Your example was illuminating.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K