Calculating the Radius of Curvature of a Distant Tree's Virtual Image

Click For Summary
To determine the radius of curvature for a virtual image of a distant tree viewed in a curved mirror, the mirror equation 1/do + 1/di = 1/f is applicable, where the image distance (di) is given as 18.8 cm. Since the image is virtual, it indicates a concave mirror, leading to a positive radius of curvature. The radius of curvature (R) can be calculated using the formula R = (di * do) / (di + do), with do approximated as infinite. By substituting values and solving, the radius of curvature is found to be approximately 37.6 cm, indicating a significantly curved mirror.
Jodi
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hi; Could someone please help me with the following question: The image of a distant tree is virtual and very small when viewed in a curved mirror. The image appears to be 18.8 cm behind the mirror. What is its radius of curvature? (Use positive for concave and negative for convex). Would I use the mirror equation 1/do + 1/di = 1/f? How would I go about this question? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jodi said:
Hi; Could someone please help me with the following question: The image of a distant tree is virtual and very small when viewed in a curved mirror. The image appears to be 18.8 cm behind the mirror. What is its radius of curvature? (Use positive for concave and negative for convex). Would I use the mirror equation 1/do + 1/di = 1/f? How would I go about this question? Thanks

Your equation will get you started. The object distance can be taken as infinite. Solve the equation for the focal length. Radius of curvature is related to the focal length. Do you know how?
 


To calculate the radius of curvature of a curved mirror, we can use the mirror equation, which relates the object distance (do), image distance (di), and focal length (f) of the mirror. In this case, we are given the image distance, which is 18.8 cm. We also know that the image is virtual, meaning it is formed behind the mirror. This suggests that the mirror is concave, so we can use a positive value for the radius of curvature.

Using the mirror equation, we can rearrange it to solve for the radius of curvature (R):

1/do + 1/di = 1/f

R = (di * do) / (di + do)

Plugging in the values given, we get:

R = (18.8 cm * do) / (18.8 cm + do)

We can now solve for do by setting the equation equal to 0 and using the quadratic formula:

0 = (18.8 cm * do) / (18.8 cm + do) - R

Solving for do, we get:

do = 18.8 cm * (1 + √(1 + 4R/18.8 cm)) / 2

Therefore, the radius of curvature is given by:

R = 2 * do / (1 + √(1 + 4R/18.8 cm))

By plugging in different values for R, we can find the corresponding radius of curvature. For example, if we assume the image is formed at a distance of 18.8 cm, we get a radius of curvature of 37.6 cm. This suggests that the mirror is quite curved, which makes sense given that the image of the distant tree is very small.

In summary, to calculate the radius of curvature of a distant tree's virtual image in a curved mirror, we can use the mirror equation and solve for the radius of curvature using the equation R = (di * do) / (di + do). We can then use the quadratic formula to solve for the object distance, which will give us the final value for the radius of curvature.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
995
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
26K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K