Misunderstanding about work definition

  • Thread starter Thread starter bolbol2054
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Work
AI Thread Summary
Work is defined in physics as the product of force and displacement, with displacement measured during the application of force. The direction of displacement must align with the applied force for work to be calculated correctly. Even after the initial force is removed, other forces like friction can still affect the motion of the object. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately assessing work done in various scenarios. Proper consideration of all forces involved is essential for a complete understanding of the concept.
bolbol2054
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
as scientists defines it work is the product of force and displacement i just want to ask is the displacement meusured during force application or during motion even if the force removed
thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's measured during the force's application, and the displacement is measured in the direction of the applied force.
 
thank you
 
It's important to ensure you consider the correct force though.

For instance if you push something and initiate motion so it rolls or slides away, although your push has ceased, the force of friction is still acting.
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Work-Energy Theorem for Moving Block and Spring System?
Replies
4
Views
2K
B About verification on Kinetic energy and work
Replies
16
Views
2K
I Virtual work and constraint forces
Replies
1
Views
1K
B What is the need for the concepts of Work and Energy (KE)?
Replies
8
Views
1K
Definite and indefinite integration in the definition of work
Replies
4
Views
8K
How to define "energy" and "work" without using either word
Replies
2
Views
2K
Who Exerts Gravity Power? Force x Velocity Dot Product
Replies
19
Views
2K
Help -- I don't understand work
Replies
30
Views
3K
B Confusion while trying to build intuition of centripetal force
Replies
15
Views
3K
I Understanding Bolted Joints: Shigley's Explanation & Real-Life Testing
Replies
8
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top