Mixed states and total wave function for three-Fermion-systems

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the total wave function for a three-fermion system, emphasizing the need for antisymmetry due to the fermionic nature of the particles. The speaker has identified the symmetric states in the j=3/2 subspace and notes that the remaining states are neither symmetric nor antisymmetric. They express confusion about the absence of antisymmetric states and query the appropriate approach to construct the total wave function. The mention of Slater determinants suggests a potential method for achieving the required antisymmetry in the wave function. Understanding the implications of these calculations is crucial for accurately modeling fermionic systems.
Like Tony Stark
Messages
182
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
Find the total wave function (including the spatial part) of a system of three spin ##\frac{1}{2}## particles.
Relevant Equations
##\Psi = \psi_s(x_1, x_2, x_3) \xi_a (S_1, S_2, S_3) + \psi_a(x_1, x_2, x_3) \xi_s (S_1, S_2, S_3)##
I've already calculated the total spin of the system in the addition basis:

##\ket{1 \frac{3}{2} \frac{3}{2}}; \ket{1 \frac{3}{2} \frac{-3}{2}}; \ket{1 \frac{3}{2} \frac{1}{2}}; \ket{1 \frac{3}{2} \frac{-3}{2}}; \ket{0 \frac{1}{2} \frac{1}{2}}; \ket{0 \frac{1}{2} \frac{-1}{2}}; \ket{1 \frac{1}{2} \frac{1}{2}}; \ket{1 \frac{1}{2} \frac{-1}{2}}##

The states corresponding to the ##j=\frac{3}{2}##-subspace are symmetric and I'll call it ##\xi_s (S_1, S_2, S_3)##, while the other states are neither symmetric nor antisymmetric.

The total wave function must be antisymmetric since the system is fermionic. If there were antisymmetric states, the wave function would be:

##\Psi = \psi_s(x_1, x_2, x_3) \xi_a (S_1, S_2, S_3) + \psi_a(x_1, x_2, x_3) \xi_s (S_1, S_2, S_3)##

with

##\psi_s(x_1, x_2, x_3)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{3!}} [\psi_1 (x_1) \psi_2 (x_2) \psi_3 (x_3)+\psi_1 (x_1) \psi_2 (x_3) \psi_3 (x_2)+\psi_1 (x_2) \psi_2 (x_1) \psi_3 (x_3)+\psi_1 (x_2) \psi_2 (x_3) \psi_3 (x_1)+\psi_1 (x_3) \psi_2 (x_1) \psi_3 (x_2)+\psi_1 (x_3) \psi_2 (x_2) \psi_3 (x_1)]##

##\psi_a(x_1, x_2, x_3)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{3!}} [\psi_1 (x_1) \psi_2 (x_2) \psi_3 (x_3)-\psi_1 (x_1) \psi_2 (x_3) \psi_3 (x_2)-\psi_1 (x_2) \psi_2 (x_1) \psi_3 (x_3)+\psi_1 (x_2) \psi_2 (x_3) \psi_3 (x_1)+\psi_1 (x_3) \psi_2 (x_1) \psi_3 (x_2)-\psi_1 (x_3) \psi_2 (x_2) \psi_3 (x_1)]##

But we don't have ##\xi_a (S_1, S_2, S_3)## states.

What should I do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...