MLE for Uniform(-A,A) - exam today

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nolita_day
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exam Mle
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) for a random variable X distributed uniformly over the interval Unif(-θ, θ) is determined to be max|Xi|. The reasoning involves understanding the likelihood function L(θ) and its constraints, specifically that θ must be greater than 0, and must also satisfy the conditions max(X_1, X_2, ..., X_n) ≤ θ and -θ ≤ min(X_1, X_2, ..., X_n). The graph of L(θ) should reflect these conditions to accurately represent the likelihood function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE)
  • Familiarity with Uniform distribution, specifically Unif(-θ, θ)
  • Knowledge of likelihood functions and their properties
  • Basic graphing skills to visualize L(θ)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Maximum Likelihood Estimation in statistical inference
  • Learn about the Uniform distribution and its applications in statistics
  • Explore the concept of likelihood functions and how to derive them
  • Practice graphing likelihood functions for different distributions
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, data scientists, and students preparing for exams in statistical inference who seek to deepen their understanding of MLE and uniform distributions.

nolita_day
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So my prof. has not replied to my e-mail, so I was wondering if someone here can help me understand why the MLE for a random variable X~Unif(-θ,θ) is max|Xi|. Attached is the problem as well as my attempt for the solution.

Here is my thought process:

Upon sketching the graph, I thought the answer would be min( |min(Xi)|, |max(Xi)| ) because there are two different tails and the one closer to zero should have the highest value for L(θ). So if |min(Xi)| < |max(Xi)|, then L(θ = min(Xi)) > L(θ = max(Xi)), which would make min(Xi) the MLE for θ.

Whether or not this gets answered in time before my exam, I'd still be curious to know the reasoning for the correct answer :)

Thanks a bunch!
 

Attachments

  • 9.png
    9.png
    27.6 KB · Views: 668
Physics news on Phys.org
In my opinion, your last graph is slightly confused. You are attempting to show the interval [itex][-\theta, \theta][/itex] on the graph. You should only show L as a function of [itex]\theta[/itex].

For L to be greater than 0, the conditions on [itex]\theta[/itex] are:
[itex]\theta \gt 0[/itex] (or else the interval [itex][-\theta,\theta][/itex] would have zero length)
[itex]max(X_1,X_2,...X_n) \le \theta[/itex]
[itex]-\theta \le min(X_1,X_2,...X_n)[/itex]

The last condition is equivalent to [itex]\theta \ge - min(X_1,X_2,...X_n)[/itex]

So the graph should show L > 0 when [itex]\theta[/itex] is larger than the largest of the two values [itex]-min(X_1,X_2,...X_n)[/itex] and [itex]max(X_1,X_2,...X_n)[/itex].

It doesn't look pretty, but you can denote that condition by
[itex]\theta \ge max( -min(X_1,X_2,...X_n), max(X_1,X_2,...X_n) )[/itex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
43
Views
8K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K