Model for single lane of traffic

  • Thread starter Thread starter andrey21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Model
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the partial differential equation (PDE) for a single lane of traffic, represented as p dv/dx + v dp/dx + dp/dt = 0, where v = kx/p. The conclusion reached is that dp/dt = -k, derived by substituting v into the PDE and simplifying. A critical error identified in the initial attempt was the incorrect treatment of p as a constant while differentiating v with respect to x. The correct approach involves recognizing the dependency of p on x during differentiation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with the method of characteristics in PDEs
  • Knowledge of fluid dynamics concepts, particularly traffic flow models
  • Basic calculus, specifically differentiation techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of characteristics for solving PDEs
  • Explore traffic flow models and their mathematical representations
  • Learn about the implications of variable dependencies in differentiation
  • Investigate applications of PDEs in fluid dynamics and traffic engineering
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineers, and researchers involved in traffic flow analysis, fluid dynamics, or anyone looking to deepen their understanding of partial differential equations in applied contexts.

andrey21
Messages
475
Reaction score
0
A model for a single lane of traffic is given by the following pde

p dv/dx + v dp/dx + dp/dt = 0

Where:

v = kx/p



Show that

dp/dt = -k



Here is my attempt

v = kx/p

dv/dx = k/p

p= kx/v

dp/dx = k/v

Substituting into original pde:

p (k/p) + v(k/v) + dp/dt=0

Clearly made an error, any help would be great
 
Physics news on Phys.org
p dv/dx + v dp/dx + dp/dt = 0

Where:

v = kx/p

Show that

dp/dt = -k

p dv/dx + v dp/dx + dp/dt = 0 can be written as

d(pv)/dx + dp/dt = 0 ----------- 1

v = kx/p => pv = kx -> put in 1

we get dp/dt = - k

method you used is wrong because you can't partially differentiate v w.r.t x in an equation which contains p (also a function of x) -. while differentiating you treated p as a constant w.r.t to x..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
943
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K