Modeling an Einstein solid that is coupled to a paramagnet

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on modeling the magnetocaloric effect (MCE) of dysprosium using an Einstein solid and a paramagnet framework. The user is exploring the complexities of summing entropies in the system while considering isentropic conditions, where the magnetic entropy decrease must be countered by an increase in temperature entropy. The user seeks to simplify the model by neglecting certain states and is questioning the validity of their assumptions regarding multiplicities in the limit where energy greatly exceeds the number of oscillators. The discussion highlights the need for further exploration of phonon effects and the appropriateness of current equations given the significant energy-to-particle ratio.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the magnetocaloric effect (MCE)
  • Familiarity with Einstein solid and paramagnet models
  • Knowledge of entropy and thermodynamic principles
  • Basic proficiency in statistical mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical modeling of the magnetocaloric effect in dysprosium
  • Explore the implications of phonon coupling in magnetic systems
  • Study the product of multiplicities in statistical mechanics
  • Investigate the criteria for neglecting states in thermodynamic models
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on thermodynamics, magnetism, and materials science, will benefit from this discussion. It is especially relevant for those modeling complex systems involving magnetic materials and entropy considerations.

Ron Burgundypants
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a project at university to calculate the magnetocaloric effect of dysprosium. This will be done using a new technique designed at the university of which its not necessary to go into detail about. In short, the Dy is placed in a solenoid, through which a current runs, the current causes dipole alignment and a lowering of the magnetic entropy of Dy. Now assume we have Isentropic conditions, for the total entropy to stay constant the temperature entropy must increase to counter the magnetic entropy decrease, this is the basic idea of the MCE. More can be read below

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_refrigeration

The problem

I want to model the system so I can run some simulations, make some calculations and measure them afterwards in the real setup.

I think the system (Just the Dysprosium) can be modeled as an einstein solid and a paramagnet at the same time but I think its probably not that simple. I spoke to my supervisor about it and he agreed on the model but that there would also be some summing of the entropies of the different states of the system, so maybe there are some states that can be neglected to make the problem simpler, but I feel there is a lot more to this problem that I haven't thought of.

I first looked at the product of the multiplicities of an Einstein solid in the limit were q>>N (much more energy than the no. of oscillators) and a paramagnet. Is this a fair assumption to make? I get a very ugly expression which you can see by just taking the product of the multiplicity of the Einstein solid and the paramagnet, I won't bother posting it just yet.

I also have 10g of dysprosium, some quick calculations show that the amount of energy therein is greater than the number of particles by 10 orders of magnitude. Using Schroeders book ' Introduction to thermal physics' as a guide I see he discerns between 'large' and 'very large' numbers but its not entirely clear where the boundaries are. I know 10 orders is a HUGE amount of difference but is it reasonable to change the equations because of the difference between these numbers? Is it big enough?!?

So I know I'm not really asking a specific question but I would like to hear some thoughts, ideas, suggestions on the matter. How can I tweak the model, is it accurate, what other considerations have I missed?

Thanks guys
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The effect of the phonons in the sample is something we haven't thought about, there would be some coupling but again, its a bit beyond my level.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K