Modification in Coulomb's Law and its implications

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of modifying Coulomb's Law from an inverse square relationship to an inverse cube relationship, particularly regarding an isolated charged conducting sphere. It is established that if Coulomb's Law were to follow an inverse cube relationship, the electric field inside the conductor would remain zero, but the volumetric charge density could still be non-zero. This counterintuitive conclusion arises from the nature of charge distribution within conductors and the principles of electrostatics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law and its mathematical formulation
  • Knowledge of electrostatics, particularly in relation to conductors
  • Familiarity with electric field concepts and charge density
  • Basic mathematical skills for analyzing physical theories
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical derivation of Coulomb's Law and its implications
  • Study the properties of electric fields within conductors in electrostatics
  • Explore the concept of volumetric charge density and its significance
  • Investigate alternative theories of electrostatics and their mathematical foundations
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in advanced electrostatics concepts, particularly those exploring theoretical modifications to established physical laws.

Aastik Tripathi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If the coulomb's law instead of following an inverse square relationship, follows an inverse cube relationship, How would it affect an isolated charged conducting sphere? How would it's field vary within the volume and how would the volumetric charge density be affected?
Please give in some valuable insights , would be helpful .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aastik Tripathi said:
If the coulomb's law instead of following an inverse square relationship, follows an inverse cube relationship

It doesn't. Is there a particular reason why you are asking?
 
PeterDonis said:
It doesn't. Is there a particular reason why you are asking?
It came up when I was attending my classes , that in some examination this concept was asked using a charged spherical conductor as mentioned above, the answer was told that it there will not be any electric field inside the bulk of the conductor which was quite intuitive, however the charge density was claimed to be non zero, which was quite counter intuitive as I believed charges would experience repulsion when present in the bulk, that's why I posted this to clear the doubt .
 
Aastik Tripathi said:
in some examination this concept was asked using a charged spherical conductor as mentioned above, the answer was told that it there will not be any electric field inside the bulk of the conductor which was quite intuitive, however the charge density was claimed to be non zero, which was quite counter intuitive as I believed charges would experience repulsion when present in the bulk

Can you post any math that was used? Normally here at PF we only discuss the actual theories of physics, not alternative theories; but I can see the point of an exam question like this if it is to show you why an inverse square law matches our actual experience where an inverse cube law would not. But the answer should be based on math, not intuition.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K