Moment of Inertia Compass Needle

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the rotational inertia of a magnetic compass needle using its oscillation frequency and magnetic properties. The user initially confuses angular velocity with oscillation frequency and struggles with the energy equations for simple harmonic motion (SHM). After clarifications, they realize the importance of using the correct expressions for potential and kinetic energy, particularly in relation to torque. The conversation emphasizes the need for careful algebraic manipulation and understanding of SHM principles to reach the correct solution. Ultimately, the user gains clarity on the problem and appreciates the guidance received.
Crush1986
Messages
205
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


You place a magnetic compass on a horizontal surface, allow the needle to settle, and then give the compass a gentle wiggle to cause the needle to oscillate about its equilibrium position. The oscillation frequency is 0.321 Hz. Earth's magnetic field at the location of the compass has a horizontal component of 18.0*10^-6 T. The needle has a magnetic moment of 0.680 mJ/T. What is the needle's rotational inertia bout it's (vertical) axis of rotation?[/B]

Homework Equations


K= \frac{1} {2} I \omega^2
U= B \mu sin \theta
[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution



I set the max kinetic energy to the max potential energy (since there is no damping they should be equal i believe). And I set \omega equal to 2\pi f.However, I'm getting a solution that is twice as big as the solution when I solve for I=2k/ \omega^2=(2\mu B)/(2\pi f)^2.

I was thinking that maybe the omega I'm working with is the average, and that I want the max? Since omega changes like a sinusoidal function maybe I should multiply my omega by \sqrt 2? Like how you find the RMS values of sinusoidal functions? This would then make my omega equal to 2*\sqrt 2*\pi*f. I would then get the correct answer.

Is all that completely silly though and I'm just doing the problem flat wrong? A solution manual that I have solved the problem by equating the period to 2*\pi \sqrt(I/ \mu * B).

Any help would be greatly appreciated. This problem is driving me nuts because my method to me just makes so much sense, but apparently my first shot was wrong, and I'm not sure if I've corrected it properly or if the whole thing is just junk :(.

[/B]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are confusing ω as a rate of change of angle with ω as denoting an oscillation frequency. Consider this simple SHM solution for the variation of some angle: ##\theta = A \sin(\omega t)##. Differentiating, ##\dot \theta = A\omega \cos(\omega t)##. Writing that as ##\omega = A\omega \cos(\omega t)## would be to confuse two quite separate quantities.
 
Sooo... It can't be done the way I wanted to do it at all? I can't find the angular speed somehow and solve the problem like this? I mean is there anyway to get the angular speed from the info given or no?
 
Last edited:
Crush1986 said:
Sooo... It can't be done the way I wanted to do it at all? I can't find the angular speed somehow and solve the problem like this?
This much is valid
Crush1986 said:
I set the max kinetic energy to the max potential energy
Just be careful how you express those items. I would start with a generic SHM equation, θ=Asin(ωt), and differentiate as necessary, being careful not confuse ##\dot \theta## with ##\omega##.
 
Oh ok. I must of typed something off a bit in wording. Sorry.

So is my logic right though? The frequency is .312 Hz so the average angular speed is about 1.9 rad/sec, I could multiply it by the square root of two to get the max angular velocity? It seems to work but I don't inow if I'm just lucky. I don't know if I have enough info to make an equation with a trig function since I don't know the amplitude.

Or is all my talk just faulty? This problem is delving up stuff from a past class and I may just be all off, haha.
 
Last edited:
Crush1986 said:
Oh ok. I must of typed something off a bit in wording. Sorry.
No, I mean be careful how you express the PE and KE algebraically.
Seems to me this is wrong:
Crush1986 said:
##U= B \mu sin \theta##
The right hand side looks like the expression for torque, not energy.
After correcting that, try the following:
- assume a simple SHM behaviour
- write out the algebraic expressions for the PE and KE deduced from that formula
- determine the max value of each and equate them
You will need to make an approximation using the fact that theta is small.
 
Ohhhh yah that is supposed to be a cos because it's a dot product.

I'm not sure about doing a small angle approximation though. Think I'll just have to make more sense of the solution in the manual and try to think like that. I guess this way wasn't as nice as I had originally thought haha...
 
Crush1986 said:
Ohhhh yah that is supposed to be a cos because it's a dot product.
No, it's a cross product. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_moment#Definition. But the result is torque, not energy.
Suppose there's a torque T that succeeds in turning an object through a small angle d##\theta##. How much work is done?

[However, I note that one valid form for the energy is in terms of 1 - cos(theta). Can you provide a link for your equation?]
 
I though U = - \mu B cos \theta the dot product of mu and B?

Work done by torque through a very small angle? Is that torque times the change in angle? Assuming the change in angle is small enough I guess to consider the torque constant.
 
  • #10
Crush1986 said:
I though U = \mu B cos \theta the dot product of mu and B?
I can't find such an equation on the net, which is why I asked for a link. It's almost right, as you will see...
Work done by torque through a very small angle? Is that torque times the change in angle? Assuming the change in angle is small enough I guess to consider the torque constant.
Yes. So if the torque is ##B \mu \sin(\theta)##, what is the work done?
 
  • #11
Using a small angle approximation isn't it B \mu \theta ? I'm just not seeing how I'm closer to an answer though if it's right.
 
  • #12
Crush1986 said:
Using a small angle approximation isn't it B \mu \theta ? I'm just not seeing how I'm closer to an answer though if it's right.
The torque can be approximated to that, yes, but what is the work done for a small change in theta? Use what you wrote here:
Crush1986 said:
Is that torque times the change in angle?
 
  • #13
Oh I meant to write the work. You're right though I think I left out an extra theta?
W= B \mu \theta^2 ?
 
  • #14
Crush1986 said:
Oh I meant to write the work. You're right though I think I left out an extra theta?
W= B \mu \theta^2 ?
Almost. What's ##\int \theta d\theta##?
 
  • #15
Oh dang it... My typing tonight at this late hour...

W= \frac {1} {2} B \mu \theta^2
 
  • #16
Crush1986 said:
Oh dang it... My typing tonight at this late hour...

W= \frac {1} {2} B \mu \theta^2
Good.
So if theta obeys ##\theta = A \sin(\omega t)##, what is the max of W? And what is the max of the KE?
 
  • #17
Well the max theta will ever be is A. Would both be equal to 1/2 B \mu A^2? I felt before I could reach an answer like this. I wasn't sure how I'd get past the Amplitude though, I don't know what it is.
 
  • #18
Crush1986 said:
Well the max theta will ever be is A. Would both be equal to 1/2 B \mu A^2?
Yes, but you can compute the max KE another way. Differentiate the SHM equation to get the equation for ##\dot \theta##. The A's will cancel eventually.
 
  • #19
Wow I just got it! Thx so much for your help and patience. I'm not usually this slow. No sleep, night shift work tonight... Not good for physics work haha. Cheers!
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K