Moment of Inertia in Equilateral Triangle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The moment of inertia for a solid equilateral triangle about an axis at the triangle's vertex, perpendicular to the plane, is calculated as 2ML²/9. This result is derived by initially treating the triangle as three point masses, each with a mass of 1/3M, located at the vertices. The distance from the center of the triangle to each vertex is L/√3. It is crucial to note that simply moving the mass to the vertices without proper adjustment leads to an incorrect moment of inertia, as the distribution of mass must be accurately represented.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of moment of inertia concepts
  • Familiarity with the parallel axis theorem
  • Basic knowledge of calculus and integrals
  • Concept of mass distribution in geometric shapes
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the parallel axis theorem in different geometries
  • Learn how to derive moment of inertia using integrals for various shapes
  • Explore the concept of mass distribution and its effects on moment of inertia
  • Investigate the differences between point mass and continuous mass distributions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and engineering, particularly those focusing on mechanics and structural analysis, will benefit from this discussion on calculating the moment of inertia for geometric shapes.

mishima
Messages
576
Reaction score
43
The problem is to find the moment of inertia for a solid equilateral triangle about an axis at the triangle's vertex which is perpendicular to the plane of the triangle. Mass is given as M.

I was wanting to treat it like 3 point masses at each vertex with 1/3 mass. Then I could use the sum definition of moment of inertia instead of the integral. The distance from axis at center of the equilateral triangle to each vertex is L/√3.

Ʃ mr2= 3(1/3 M * L2/9) = ML2/9

Then by the parallel axis theorem I can shift this out to a vertex using that same distance for a final result of

2ML2/9

I know it can be done by treating dA like a thin rod and using calculus, I was just curious why the above doesn't get the same answer. Isn't it dynamically the same to treat it like 3 1/3 masses on each vertex?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mishima said:
I was wanting to treat it like 3 point masses at each vertex with 1/3 mass.

You cannot just "move" all the mass to the vertices without getting a different moment of inertia. It is possible to make a 3-point-mass triangle that has an equivalent moment of inertia around the center of mass perpendicular to the plate, but each 1/3 of the mass would then have to be placed L/(2√6) from the center of mass and not at geometric vertex at distance L/√3. You can think of this as a partitioning the triangle into 3 identically diamond-shaped parts.

However, the moment of inertia around center of mass can be found fairly easy by standard integrals so you should probably be able to show how to get the moment of inertia following this approach.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
26K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K