Moment of inertia of a metal plate about three points

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia of a metal plate with a quarter cut off, specifically about three points: the top left corner, the origin, and the former location of the bottom right corner. The initial confusion stems from the application of the parallel axis theorem, which requires using the center of mass (CoM) rather than the origin. Participants clarify that the moment of inertia can be determined by first calculating it for the entire plate and then subtracting the moment of the removed section. It is noted that for ranking the points in descending order, one can simplify the process by considering their distances to the CoM. Ultimately, the intuition about the ranking is affirmed as correct.
Krushnaraj Pandya
Gold Member
Messages
697
Reaction score
73

Homework Statement


Moment of inertia of a metal plate (center at origin) which was a square before 1/4th of it was cut off (4th quadrant), about three points a)- top leftmost corner in 2nd quadrant b)- origin and c) (where the right-lowest corner used to be in 4th quadrant) ranked in decreasing order

Homework Equations


I=Mr^2

The Attempt at a Solution


using my intuition, I figured the order is c<a<b, since more points are farther away from c, then a and then b- but according to parallel axis theorem moment of inertia at b and c should be same...i'm confused how to do this mathematically
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Krushnaraj Pandya said:
but according to parallel axis theorem moment of inertia at b and c should be same...
Can you explain this?

I have a feeling you meant to say “a and c should be the same”? If so, your mistake is that the parallel axis theorem must use the center of mass. The CoM is not at the origin.
 
Start by determining the moment of inertia of the plate before the square was cut off. Determine it for each of the three points. Then determine the moment of inertia of the plate that was cut off. Determine that for each of the three points. Now subtract. The moment of inertia of the plate after the square was cut off is the moment of the plate before the square was cut off, minus the moment of the square that was cut off.
 
Nathanael said:
Can you explain this?

I have a feeling you meant to say “a and c should be the same”? If so, your mistake is that the parallel axis theorem must use the center of mass. The CoM is not at the origin.
yes, that's what I meant. Thanks for pointing out my mistake
 
Gene Naden said:
Start by determining the moment of inertia of the plate before the square was cut off. Determine it for each of the three points. Then determine the moment of inertia of the plate that was cut off. Determine that for each of the three points. Now subtract. The moment of inertia of the plate after the square was cut off is the moment of the plate before the square was cut off, minus the moment of the square that was cut off.
Excellent! Thanks a lot
 
Moment of inertia is additive, so what Gene says is true. But, if we’re only asked to rank the three points in descending order, then we don’t need to do all that work.

Your intuition (and answer) is correct. The parallel axis theorem can be used to restate the problem as, “order a,b,c by their distance to the center of mass,” which is simpler.
 
Nathanael said:
Moment of inertia is additive, so what Gene says is true. But, if we’re only asked to rank the three points in descending order, then we don’t need to do all that work.

Your intuition (and answer) is correct. The parallel axis theorem can be used to restate the problem as, “order a,b,c by their distance to the center of mass,” which is simpler.
Certainly, I understand it much better now. Thank you.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K