Moment of inertia of a spherical shell

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The moment of inertia of a spherical shell can be derived using both spherical and Cartesian coordinates, leading to the same result of \(\frac{2}{3} MR^2\). The infinitesimal cylinder's length in the derivation is correctly represented as \(R d\theta\) to account for the surface area of the spherical sector. The area of an infinitesimal segment in spherical coordinates is given by \(dA = 2\pi R \sin\theta \, R \, d\theta\), while in Cartesian coordinates, it is \(dA = 2\pi R \, dx\). The discussion emphasizes the importance of consistency in coordinate systems during derivation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of moment of inertia concepts
  • Familiarity with spherical and Cartesian coordinate systems
  • Knowledge of calculus, particularly integration techniques
  • Basic physics principles related to rotational motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of moment of inertia for different geometries, such as solid spheres and cylinders
  • Learn about the application of spherical coordinates in physics problems
  • Explore advanced integration techniques in calculus
  • Investigate the relationship between mass distribution and moment of inertia
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of rotational dynamics and the moment of inertia in various coordinate systems.

Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
Hey. There's one thing I've always been wondering about when it comes to deriving the expression for the moment of inertia of a spherical shell.

Namely, why is the length of the infinitesimal cylinder used in the derivations (like here ) equal to ##R d \theta##, instead of ##R d \theta \cdot \sin(\theta)##? Afterall, ##R d\theta## isn't the actual height of the cylinder. The vertical component (the component in the direction of the axis of rotation) of ##R d\theta## is the length, which equals to ##R d \theta \cdot \sin(\theta)##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's not the best of derivations.

They are accounting for the distance between the band and the axis of revolution. The problem with the derivation is that the authors are switching back and forth between cartesian (dx) and spherical (dθ). Choose one and stick with it!

Using dx, that little band is a spherical segment. Regardless of location on a sphere, the area of a spherical segment of height h on a sphere of radius R is ##A = 2\pi R h##, or ##dA = 2\pi R dx## in the case of an infinitesimal segment. The mass of that infinitesimal segment is ##dm = \rho dA = \frac{M}{4 \pi R^2}\,2\pi R\,dx = \frac M {2R} dx## . The distance to the axis is given by ##r^2=R^2-x^2##, and thus the moment of inertial is ##\int_{-R}^R (R^2-x^2) \frac M {2R} dx = \frac 2 3 MR^2## .

Using dθ, that little band is the surface of an open spherical sector. The area of that infinitesimal sector is ##dA = 2\pi R\sin\theta\, R\,d\theta##, so the mass is thus ##dm = \rho dA = \frac{M}{4 \pi R^2}\, 2\pi R\sin\theta\, R \, d\theta = \frac M 2 \sin\theta\,d\theta##. The distance to the axis is ##r = R\sin\theta## and thus the moment of inertial is ##\int_0^{\pi} (R^2\sin^2\theta)\,\frac M 2 \sin\theta\,d\theta = \frac 2 3 MR^2## .
 
  • Like
Likes Raphael M and Nikitin
oh I'm such an idiot. of course! thanks, I see it now :) It's because the infinitesimal cylinder rolled up must have a length ##R d \theta## for it to cover the surface area of the circle sector.

thanks :)
 
Really Thnx for your explication, but I can't understand why dA is equal to 2πRsinθRdθ and why are you using cilindrical coordenates instead of spherical.

I've tried to solv for dA = sinϕdϕdθ and what I've got was ρ4 π r²
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
525
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
813
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K