Moment of inertia with triple integrals

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia of a solid cone using triple integrals, specifically comparing cylindrical and spherical coordinate systems. The correct integral setup for cylindrical coordinates is established as ∫∫∫ r² dV with limits r (0 to z/a), θ (0 to 2π), and z (0 to b), yielding the moment of inertia I = (πb⁵)/(10a⁴). The spherical coordinate approach is deemed less effective due to the complexity of limits and the need to adjust the integrand to account for the perpendicular distance from the axis of rotation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of triple integrals in calculus
  • Familiarity with cylindrical and spherical coordinate systems
  • Knowledge of the moment of inertia concept in physics
  • Ability to perform multivariable integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about the derivation of the moment of inertia for various geometric shapes
  • Study the differences between cylindrical and spherical coordinates in integration
  • Explore advanced integration techniques for multivariable calculus
  • Investigate the application of triple integrals in physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and engineering, particularly those focusing on mechanics and calculus, will benefit from this discussion on calculating moments of inertia using integration techniques.

demonelite123
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
so i have to find the moment of inertia of a solid cone given by the equations z = ar and z = b by using a triple integral. The density of the cone is assumed to be 1. so the integral looks like ∫ ∫ ∫ r^2 dV. so first i did it with dV = rdrdθdz with limits r (from 0 to z/a), θ (from 0 to 2pi), and z (from 0 to b) and i got the answer (pi)b^5 / (10a^4) which seems to be right. now i am trying to do the triple integral instead with dV = rdzdrdθ. i am having trouble deciding the limits now. for z, i know that r and θ are to be kept constant so my limits for z are from ar to b. then my limits for r are from 0 to z/a and my limits for θ are from 0 to 2pi. however after doing the integrations, my answer turned out messy involving a's, b's, and z's which shouldn't be in the final answer. how do i set up the limits correctly when integrating with respect to z first, then r and theta afterwards?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, your first try r:0~z/a, θ:0~2pi, z:0~b. And first integrate r then z(or last).
why z:0~b, not z:ar~b?
The reason is we first integrate r, and r:0~z/a, or not?
Now, your secend try z:ar~b, θ:0~2pi, and r:0~z/a.
We first integrate z, why r:0~z/a appears z again?
z/a isn't a constant.
 
Woah, you call this an introductory physics problem??

OK, so I don't know the equation for the moment of inertia of a cone off the top of my head. But if you do your math right, then your answer from the cylindrical coordinates integral will be right, but your answer from the spherical coordinates integral will be wrong. You've got this funny equation in physics which says,

I = \int r^2dm

But what they don't tell you is that the "r" is the perpendicular distance from the axis of rotation (which you usually set to be the z axis). If you do it in spherical coordinates, you can't just assume that the r in the above integrand is the same as the r from spherical coordinates. Instead, you need to use:

I = \int [rsin(\theta)]r^2sin(\theta)drd\theta d\phi

Multiplying r by sin(\theta) will take the component of \vec{r} in the xy plane, which is what you want.

As for the limits of integration to use in spherical coordinates...I'm going to have to think about that one for a second. Spherical coordinates are a very unnatural way to describe a cone.
 
To 3#
For this problem used cylindrical coordinate maybe better.
 
oh i got it now. the limits on r should be from 0 to b/a. setting that limit gave me the same answer as i got before. thanks for the help everyone! :smile:
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
813
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K