Moments of Inertia: Practical Applications & Integration

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation and practical applications of moments of inertia (MOIs), emphasizing the importance of understanding both the Parallel Axis Theorem and integral calculus. Participants highlight that the moment of inertia represents a body's resistance to angular acceleration, analogous to mass in linear motion. Practical applications are illustrated through examples such as the inertia of car parts during acceleration. The conversation concludes with a consensus that integral calculus is essential for accurately determining the moment of inertia for complex shapes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Parallel Axis Theorem
  • Basic knowledge of integral calculus
  • Familiarity with Newton's 2nd law for rotational motion
  • Concept of rotational inertia as it relates to angular acceleration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of moment of inertia formulas for standard shapes using integral calculus
  • Explore practical applications of moments of inertia in automotive engineering
  • Learn about the relationship between torque and angular acceleration in rotational dynamics
  • Investigate advanced topics in rotational motion, including dynamics of rigid bodies
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the applications of rotational dynamics and moments of inertia in real-world scenarios.

Sonny
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am currently learning about how to calculate moments of inertia of various shapes. I can calculate them fine using the Parallel Axis Theorem, but I am having some difficulty trying to understand the overall concept.

Can somebody give me some practical applications of MOEs? I am also having some difficulty relating them to my understanding of integrals. I use no integration in my present calculations, since most of the shapes I am evaluating are composites of rectangles, triangles, circles, etc..

Would integration make even these simple shapes easier to calculate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sonny,
Moment of inertia is also known as rotational inertia. That in itself says a lot. The Inertia of a body is it's resistance to acceleration. I'm sure that you are quite familiar with the concept of inertia from your study of rectilinear motion. The moment of inertia is the magnitude of, and the location of the inertia of a rotating body (it's resistance to angular acceleration).

As far as the practical use of this concept is concerned, think about this:
When you accelerate in you car, how many parts of that car undergo angular acceleration? What is the moment of inertia of each of these parts? How much force does it take to impart a given rate of acceleration to your car taking all of this into account?


A careful examination of your work will reveal that you are already using integral calculus in determining the moment of inertia for the shapes that you mentioned.

I hope this helps you,
Mike
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The parallel axis theorem allows you to calculate the rotational inertia about any axis once you know the rotational inertia about the center of mass. In order to find the rotational inertia of an object about its center of mass you would need to use integration, as Mike says. Of course, for standard shapes you can just look up the answers. (Someone else has done the integration!)

Rotational inertia is the rotational analog to mass. Newton's 2nd law for rotational motion is: α = (∑Τ)/I, where α is the angular acceleration, Τ is the torque, and I is the rotational inertia about the axis of interest. Just like mass tells you how a body will respond to an applied force (using Newton's 2nd law), rotational inertia tells you how a body will respond to an applied torque (a twisting force).
 
Thanks Guys,

I guess inertia being resistance to acceleration was what I was forgetting. And, in retrospect, it seems quite obvious that calculus is used to come up with the formulas for 'rotational inertia' about a centroid.

Cheers.
 
Sonny said:
it seems quite obvious that calculus is used to come up with the formulas for 'rotational inertia' about a centroid.

Sonny,
Good for you for seeing this! Sometimes your prof will tell you this sort of thing and you may miss it because it goes by in the wink of a eye. Sometimes some of the pieces of the puzzle are left out by a prof (gee I thought I mentioned that) and you have to try spot them on your own. It can happen, even to a very good prof.

Doc Al,
Thank you for rounding out my (too brief) explanation.
Good job,
Mike
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K