Momentum Calc: Football Player Collisions

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter GeoMeo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision Force
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the physics of momentum during football player collisions, specifically analyzing head-on versus angled impacts. The formula for momentum is established as momentum = mass x velocity, with practical examples provided for collisions at various angles, including 45 degrees and 90 degrees. Key insights reveal that the impact energy remains proportionately the same for players of different weights and speeds, emphasizing that relative speed is the critical factor in determining collision outcomes. The discussion concludes that advantages in collisions arise not from angle or speed alone, but from the ability to withstand impact.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly momentum and energy.
  • Familiarity with vector quantities and their implications in collision scenarios.
  • Knowledge of Newton's laws of motion, especially the third law.
  • Basic trigonometry, specifically sine functions and their application in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of momentum conservation in collisions.
  • Learn about energy dissipation in inelastic collisions.
  • Explore advanced collision modeling techniques using center-of-mass frames.
  • Investigate the effects of different materials and body positions in impact scenarios.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, sports scientists, coaches, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of collisions in football and other contact sports.

GeoMeo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am trying to determine the formula, (which is momentum?) of 2 objects hitting each other head-on. momentum = mass x velocity (2,000 = 200lbs x 10 mph) times 2 for 4,000. If this is correct, then if one of the masses intersected at say a 45 degree angle, what would the formula be for the force (momentum)?
As you can see I am not a physics kind of guy. I am looking for a practical formula for 2 football players colliding, one at an angle, and how it would compare to a straight on collision. My hope is that the one from the angle could achieve equal or more force with less mass but at a higher velocity then a straight on collision.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The magnitue stays the same. However, momentum is a vector quantity, so in case of a 45 deg. angle collision, part of the momenta of the cars are in the same direction and part in the opposite direction. Each component has magnitude 1/√2 times the magnitude.
 
The factor of 1/√2 would apply in an ideal situation where, for instance, a race car crumples into a massive teflon-coated concrete barrier at a 45 degree angle. In a collision of equal-sized football players, one would normally model the collision in the center-of-mass frame. That means that there is a half-angle effect at work.

For two players running in the same general direction and converging at a 45 degree angle, each player is running at a 22.5 degree angle relative to the moving center of mass. That means that each player is moving at sin(22.5 degrees) ~= 38% of their running speed relative to the center of mass. Since collision energy scales with the square of relative speed, that's about 15% of the head-on impact energy.

For two players converging at a 135 angle in generally opposite directions, each player is running at a 67.5 degree angle relative to the center of mass. That means that each player is moving at sin(67.5 degrees) ~= 92% of their running speed relative to the center of mass. Square 92% and you get about 85% of the head-on impact energy.

For two players converging at a 90 degree angle they would each be moving at 45 degrees relative to the center of mass. For this situation, the factor of sin(45 degrees) = 1/√2 applies. Square this and you get exactly 50% of the head-on impact energy.
 
jbriggs444, thanks that was very helpful.
So for equal sized football players the impact energy basically is equal for both regardless of angle. That makes sense even I can understand. If player #1 is 200 lbs and running at 10 mphs and the player #2 is 165 lbs and running at 20 mphs, the impact energy at the center-of-mass stays proportionately the same for both at any angle of impact. Correct?

Thus, player #2 doesn't achieve an advantage by colliding with #1 because of angle.
#2 player can only achieve advantage by increasing his speed to the point that his force is greater then the large #1 player. Correct?
 
GeoMeo said:
If player #1 is 200 lbs and running at 10 mphs and the player #2 is 165 lbs and running at 20 mphs, the impact energy at the center-of-mass stays proportionately the same for both at any angle of impact. Correct?

Yes. For analysis of the collision, individual speeds don't matter, only the relative speed does. But it would be an over-simplification to think that the way the impact energy is dissipated depends only on the player's relative masses.

Thus, player #2 doesn't achieve an advantage by colliding with #1 because of angle.
#2 player can only achieve advantage by increasing his speed to the point that his force is greater then the large #1 player. Correct?

You are correct that there is no advantage to be had based on angle. But there is also no advantage to be gained by speed. By Newton's third law, the force of the one player on the other is identical to the force of the other player on the one.

A player gains an advantage by arranging matters to that he can tolerate the impact while the opposing player cannot. For instance, by spearing the opponent with helmet on knee.
 
John exerts enough force on a 30 kg object to cause it to accelerates a 1.75 m/s squared. How much force did he exert? (ignore friction)
 
Force equals mass times acceleration.
Simples.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K