Momentum conservation in perfectly inelastic collision

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of momentum conservation in perfectly inelastic collisions, specifically examining a scenario where a small mass collides with a large stationary mass, such as a ball hitting a wall. Participants explore the implications of momentum conservation and the effects on the larger mass after the collision.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the conservation of momentum, suggesting that if a ball collides with a wall and becomes stuck, the total momentum after the collision would be zero, despite the ball having initial momentum.
  • Another participant clarifies that momentum is conserved only in a closed system and notes that the wall, being attached to the Earth, would not remain stationary after the collision.
  • A further reply emphasizes that the wall and Earth would indeed move slightly as a result of the collision, prompting a calculation of the Earth's speed change due to the collision.
  • One participant reflects on the practical observation of sticky objects adhering to walls and questions the velocity imparted to the wall, seeking to understand the extent of its movement post-impact.
  • Another participant reiterates the calculated velocity of the wall after the collision, suggesting it is extremely small (on the order of 10^-25 m/s) and prompts further inquiry into how far the wall would move over time.
  • There is a discussion about the initial velocity of the ball and the implications of the thrower's motion, raising questions about the overall system's momentum before and after the throw.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of momentum conservation in this scenario. While some acknowledge the movement of the wall and Earth, others remain uncertain about the interpretation of momentum conservation in practical terms, leading to an unresolved discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in assumptions about closed systems and the definitions of momentum conservation, as well as the practical implications of extremely small velocities resulting from large mass collisions.

NikhilRGS
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Dear Experts,

Total momentum of a system is said to be conserved in perfectly inelastic collisions also. I have a slight problem trying to comprehend a simple example regarding the same.

If a small mass 'm' , say a ball is thrown at a huge stationary mass 'M' , say a wall. If the collision is perfectly inelastic, both the bodies after collision is expected to follow the same speed. In this case, if the ball gets stuck on the wall the total momentum after collision would be 0. But, since the ball was moving before the collision, it has some finite momentum and hence, the total momentum before collision cannot be zero. What is it that i am missing or misinterpreting ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are missing that momentum is only conserved in a closed system. If your system is closed, the speed of the wall will not be zero after the collision, unless the wall is infinitely massive, which it is not.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NikhilRGS
NikhilRGS said:
In this case, if the ball gets stuck on the wall the total momentum after collision would be 0.

The total momentum after the collision is not zero, because the "stationary" wall and the Earth it is attached to do move very slightly in the collision. It's a good exercise to calculate just how much the speed of the Earth changes as a result of an inelastic collision with a 1kg mass moving at 10 meters per second, compare that with the precision of our best available methods of measuring speeds.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NikhilRGS
Thank you.

I am trying to understand it with the help of the idea that you suggested. But this is a regular phenomenon that we notice. If we throw something sticky on the wall, it tends to stick. So is it correct to assume that there is some velocity imparted to the massive body? And in that case, how far or by how much do we expect it to move after the impact.

And as it was suggested in the post just above this, i tried calculating the velocity at which both bodies would move.and it was found to be of the order of 10 to the power -25 m/s.
 
NikhilRGS said:
So is it correct to assume that there is some velocity imparted to the massive body? And in that case, how far or by how much do we expect it to move after the impact.

And as it was suggested in the post just above this, i tried calculating the velocity at which both bodies would move.and it was found to be of the order of 10 to the power -25 m/s.
You ask "by how much do we expect it to move". You have calculated a velocity in the neighborhood of 10-25 m/s. Assume that is correct. After 1025 seconds, we could expect the larger body to have moved by how much?

That ignores the throw. Where did the ball get its initial velocity if not from the thrower? Where did the thrower get his or her initial velocity if not from the Earth? If you factor that in then the Earth could be considered to start at rest and stop at rest and to only be moving for the duration of the throw. If the ball is in the air for one second then how far would we expect the Earth to have moved while the ball is in flight?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K