Momentum, enegy and collisions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving momentum and energy conservation in a collision between a proton and another particle. The original poster presents the scenario of an elastic collision, providing initial velocities and seeking to determine the mass and final velocity of the second particle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using conservation equations for momentum and kinetic energy to solve for the unknowns. There are attempts to simplify the equations by dropping powers of ten and rewriting them. Some participants express confusion over the results, particularly regarding the mass of the second particle being unexpectedly large.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing their equations and reasoning. There is a recognition of potential errors in calculations, and some participants suggest alternative approaches to avoid quadratic equations. However, there is no explicit consensus on the correct method or outcome yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of an elastic collision scenario and are attempting to reconcile their calculations with expected physical results. There is mention of a specific answer that one participant believes to be correct, but discrepancies in calculations are noted.

hellothere123
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
A proton (mass 1 u) moving at 7.80 x10^6m/s collides elastically and head-on with a second particle moving in the opposite direction at 2.40x10^6 m/s. After the collision, the proton is moving opposite to its initial direction at 6.60x10^6m/s. Find the mass and final velocity of the second particle. [Take the proton's initial velocity to be in the positive direction.]


I tried using the conservation of momentum and kinetic energy to do this. I get this big mess that i cannot solve for.. Please show me how i would do this. i would like to learn to do these problems. thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You should have 2 equations with 2 unknowns from each of the conservations.

Make it simpler by dropping the powers of 10 and add it back as a factor at the end.

Try writing out your equations here.
 


so if we let m1 be the proton. we have..
(7.8)-(m2)(2.4)=(-6.6)+m2v2
(7.8^2)+m2(2.4^2)=(6.6^2)+m2(v2)^2

m2 = [(7.8^2)-(6.6^2)]/[(v2)^2-(2.4^2)]

and then when i plug it back in, i get a quadratic. that gives me a mass considerably larger than the other one.
 


What do you mean considerably? If your maths is right then what stops the second particle being very large?

The Bob
 


my math is probably bad, that is why i was hoping someone could show me the math so i can see where i went wrong
 


hellothere123 said:
so if we let m1 be the proton. we have..
(7.8)-(m2)(2.4)=(-6.6)+m2v2
(7.8^2)+m2(2.4^2)=(6.6^2)+m2(v2)^2

m2 = [(7.8^2)-(6.6^2)]/[(v2)^2-(2.4^2)]

and then when i plug it back in, i get a quadratic. that gives me a mass considerably larger than the other one.

OK. So you can say that

m*(v + 2.4) = 14.4 from the first equation. And ...

m*(V2 - 2.42) = 7.82 - 6.62

Note that this factors easily into

m*(V + 2.4)(V - 2.4) = 7.82 - 6.62

But from the first equation you know m*(v + 2.4) = 14.4 So ...

14.4*(V - 2.4) = 7.82 - 6.62

Much easier than a quadratic to solve.

EDIT: Sorry the 7.82 and 6.62 terms got translated incorrectly. I fixed them now.
 
Last edited:


that is much easier and such.. and after working it out.. i did not get the right answer. the answer was 3.6 doing that gave me 1.2
 


hellothere123 said:
that is much easier and such.. and after working it out.. i did not get the right answer. the answer was 3.6 doing that gave me 1.2

Sorry. I apparently switched two terms inadvertently in typing it out. I just fixed it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K