Momentum/Impusle problem [revised]

  • Thread starter Thread starter harelo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves an inelastic collision between two cars, where Car A collides with parked Car B on a frictionless surface. Car A weighs 1100 kg and has an initial velocity, while Car B weighs 2200 kg and is initially at rest. After the collision, the two cars move together a distance of 2.8 m on a surface with a coefficient of friction of 0.4.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the coefficient of friction on the motion of the cars post-collision and question the assumption of final velocity being zero immediately after the collision. Some suggest using work-energy principles and conservation of momentum to analyze the problem.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different aspects of the problem, including the conservation of momentum and the effects of friction after the collision. Some have provided guidance on breaking the problem into two parts: the collision and the subsequent motion due to friction. There is an ongoing exchange of ideas regarding the correct interpretation of the variables involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a recognition that the initial speed of Car A needs to be determined based on the conditions after the collision, and participants are grappling with the implications of inelastic collisions on kinetic energy conservation.

harelo
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



So my problem says: "Car A (in a frictionless surface) travels at a velocity and weighs 1100 kg, Car B is parked and weighs 2200 KG, they collide in an inelastic collision (meaning they stick together) and they move a distance of 2.8 M together. The road has a coefficient of friction of 0.4"

Homework Equations



Find the velocity of the Car A before impact

The Attempt at a Solution



Last time I posted this question, our professor did not give us a coefficient of friction, which deemed the problem impossible to solve with mathematical values, but now that he realized his mistake, he gave us the problem again (an a re-test) so I just wanted to know if I'm along the right lines.

Since

[tex]F_{f}[/tex] = [tex]U_{k}[/tex]mg,

and

F = [tex]F_{f}[/tex],

we can asume that

ma = [tex]U_{k}[/tex]mg

and the masses would divide out, so

a = [tex]U_{k}[/tex]g
a = (0.4)(-9.82 [tex]m/s^{2}[/tex])
a = -3.982 [tex]m/s^{2}[/tex]

so then we can use the kinematic equation of

[tex]V_{f}[/tex]^2 = [tex]V_{o}[/tex]^2 + 2ad

where [tex]V_{f}[/tex] = 0 (this is the only part I'm iffy about), so

[tex]V_{o}[/tex] = [tex]\sqrt{-2ad}[/tex]
[tex]V_{o}[/tex] = 4.7 m/s

Is this correct? thank for the help :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There will be a vf that is nonzero, unless car A accelerates to 0m/s before it collides with car B
 
Feldoh said:
Unless car a accelerates to 0m/s then vf will not equal 0

Wouldn't the fact that they crashed and there is a force of friction mean they'll eventually come to a rest?
EDIT: but not over that distance, now I see what I did.

So should I approach it some other way? maybe through work?
 
Last edited:
harelo said:
Wouldn't the fact that they crashed and there is a force of friction mean they'll eventually come to a rest?

Yes eventually but momentum has to be conserved and right after they collide they will still be moving because if the collided them car A had a momentum that was not 0 so then the momentum right after the crash will have to get a nonzero number as well.

Edit: Work backwards, you can use the fact that the two cars went 2.8m after the collision to your advantage.
 
Feldoh said:
Edit: Work backwards, you can use the fact that the two cars went 2.8m after the collision to your advantage.

Well since I have a distance, and an acceleration and a mass, I can get work.

W = F[tex]\Delta[/tex]d
W = (m1 + m2)ad
W = (3300)(-3.982)(2.8)
W = -36793.68 J

and since W = KE

W = 1/2mv^2
v = [tex]\sqrt{2W/m}[/tex]
v = 4.72 m/s

what? ok now I'm lost.
 
Am I missing something in my interpretation of work?
 
The acceleration was the value before they collided, that won't be the acceleration after they collide.
 
Hmmmm alright, so I'm guessing kinematic equations won't work... I'm lost, can I get a clue please?
 
View the problem as having two parts:
(1) The collision. Hint: What's conserved?
(2) The coming to a stop due to friction (after the collision). What's the acceleration?

Begin by looking at part two and figure out the initial speed of the stuck-together cars immediately after the collision.
 
  • #10
Doc Al said:
View the problem as having two parts:
(1) The collision. Hint: What's conserved?
(2) The coming to a stop due to friction (after the collision). What's the acceleration?

well I know that Momentum is conserved, however kinetic energy isn't (inelastic collisions, do'h)

and the acceleration would be the the coefficient of friction times acceleration due to gravity (like shown above).

So,

[tex]m_{1}[/tex][tex]v_{1}[/tex] = ([tex]m_{1}[/tex]+[tex]m_{2}[/tex])[tex]V^{'}[/tex]

hmmmm... Where can this get me?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
harelo said:
well I know that Momentum is conserved, however kinetic energy isn't (inelastic collisions, do'h)

and the acceleration would be the the coefficient of friction times acceleration due to gravity (like shown above).
Good. (I see you've already calculated the initial speed of the stuck-together cars immediately after the collision.)

So,

[tex]m_{1}[/tex][tex]v_{1}[/tex] = ([tex]m_{1}[/tex]+[tex]m_{2}[/tex])[tex]V^{'}[/tex]
Good. Use conservation of momentum to figure out the initial speed of car A.
 
  • #12
OHHHHHH how can I be so dumb! that speed I Calculated is V'! wow I'm dumb!

So now it should be:

[tex]m_{1}[/tex][tex]v_{1}[/tex] = ([tex]m_{1}[/tex]+[tex]m_{2}[/tex])[tex]V^{'}[/tex]
[tex]v_{1}[/tex] = (([tex]m_{1}[/tex]+[tex]m_{2}[/tex])[tex]V^{'}[/tex]) / [tex]m_{1}[/tex]
[tex]v_{1}[/tex] = ((3300)(4.72))/1100
[tex]v_{1}[/tex] = 14.16 m/s

I think this should be right, is it?
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Looks good!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K