Sobhan
- 35
- 0
when studying momentum 4 vectors,i encountered the CT momentum which is MC.can some explain where has this come from?
The discussion centers on the concept of momentum in the context of special relativity, specifically focusing on 4-momentum, its components, and the energy-momentum triangle. Participants explore theoretical aspects, definitions, and relationships between different types of momentum.
Participants express differing views on the notation for 4-vectors and 3-vectors, indicating a lack of consensus on the best practices for representing these concepts. The discussion on the energy-momentum triangle also reflects differing interpretations of the dimensions involved.
Some participants note the potential for confusion in notation and definitions, particularly regarding the representation of 4-vectors and 3-vectors. There are also unresolved aspects related to the interpretation of the energy-momentum triangle.
Are you talking about the norm of the four-momentum? If yes, then ## \vec p = (\gamma m_0 c, p_x, p_y, p_z)## and ##|\vec p |^2 = \frac{E^2}{c^2} - p^2 ## where ##p## is the 3-momentum of the particle and ##E## is the particle's total energy (rest+kinetic) in that particular reference frame. (The norm is invariant in all frames.)Sobhan said:a question on the energy-momentum triangle:in this triangle one of the sides of it is PC,is this P the momentum in 4 dimensions or 3?
Generally, I would avoid using a vector arrow for 4-vectors and reserve it for 3-vectors. Things can become very confusing otherwise ...PWiz said:Are you talking about the norm of the four-momentum? If yes, then ## \vec p = (\gamma m_0 c, p_x, p_y, p_z)##
Okay. It's just that when I think of a vector in a SR, it's almost always a four-vector, so I've sort of got into a habit of putting that arrowOrodruin said:Generally, I would avoid using a vector arrow for 4-vectors and reserve it for 3-vectors. Things can become very confusing otherwise ...