rudransh verma said:
This casual explanation is making my life very difficult from morning (and now its night time) because what I knew is Tension T's direction when the rope is under stress is upwards and the force applied by monkey is downwards. So ##T=F_{MR}=-mg##
You said you do not want casual. Ask and you shall receive.
For Tension as a
stress in a rope, it has neither direction "up" nor direction "down". It has only direction "vertical". In three dimensions, tension has a coordinate representation as a 3 by 3 matrix. If you choose a coordinate system in which the first coordinate is vertically aligned with the vertical rope, the stress is uniform and the cross-sectional area of the rope is ##a## then this tensor will be $$
\begin{bmatrix}
-T/a & 0 & 0\\
0 & 0 & 0\\
0 & 0 & 0
\end{bmatrix}$$More generally, if one chooses a poorly aligned coordinate system, the tension will manifest as two or three negative terms on the main diagonal that sum (via the Pythagorean theorem) to the magnitude of the tension (per unit area) in the rope.
If one wants to recover the force transmitted by a uniform tension through an imaginary dividing line in the rope, one multiplies the stress tensor by the directed area of a cross-section through the rope.
A "directed area" is a planar area represented as a vector. The area is represented by the magnitude of this vector. The direction is represented by the direction of the vector (normal to the plane). If one multiplies a 3x3 stress tensor by a 1x3 directed area, one recovers a 3x1 force vector. That vector is the force resulting from the tension acting through the area.
Even less casually, tension need not be uniform across the rope. One could instead take a surface integral, adding up local stress times incremental directed area across a surface that bisects the rope.
What this means for a rope attached to the monkey is that you multiply the stress tensor in the body of the rope by a directed area pointing outward at the monkey and recover a vector force that points inward toward the rope. This is the force of rope on monkey.
More casually, we have a useful invariant. No matter where we choose to slice an ideal massless rope with a directed surface between the potion exerting a force and the portion on which a force is being exerted, the resulting vector force will be aligned with the rope and will have a direction opposite to the direction of the slice. [It does not matter whether you slice neatly at right angles, diagonally or along a jagged curve. The result is always the same -- aligned with the rope, not with the cut].
rudransh verma said:
So tension is basically a force that the rope applies back when it is under stress. It is an inward force. Tension T's direction at end points of rope where its attached to the body and ceiling is inwards. Tension is what we pull something with not push.
Casually speaking, yes.
rudransh verma said:
Someone said that tension is pair of opposite forces acting on small rope elements all along the rope cancelling each other. At the ends there is just one force acting inwards. Am I right?
Yes, there is one force from rope on attached object. Though, of course, Newton's third law still applies. There is an equal and opposite force from attached object on rope.