Monotonic and Continuous function is homeomorphism

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving that a monotone and continuous function H: I → I is a homeomorphism under specific conditions regarding its endpoints. The discussion centers around the implications of monotonicity and continuity in establishing properties of the function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity of proving that H is one-to-one and onto, with suggestions to use monotonicity and the Intermediate Value Theorem. There is also a question about whether "monotone" refers to strictly monotone functions, raising concerns about the validity of the proof in that case.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on how to approach the proof, suggesting methods to demonstrate that H is one-to-one and onto. There is an exploration of the continuity of the inverse function, with references to the Heine-Borel theorem and the properties of continuous images of compact sets. However, there is no explicit consensus on the approach or the assumptions required.

Contextual Notes

There are indications that the problem may be situated within a specific class context, with some participants questioning the appropriateness of certain advanced concepts for the level of the class. Additionally, the discussion includes potential constraints related to the differentiability of the function.

ForMyThunder
Messages
149
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If H:I[tex]\rightarrow[/tex]I is a monotone and continuous function, prove that H is a homeomorphism if either
a) H(0) = 0 and H(1) = 1
or b) H(0) = 1 and H(1) = 0.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So if I can prove H is a homeomorphism for a), b) follows from the fact that the map defined by t[tex]\rightarrow[/tex]H(1-t) is also a homeomorphism because it is the composite of two homeomorphisms.

H is obviously one-to-one, but I don't know how to "show" this.

At first I figured that I should assume |H(t1)-H(t2)| < [tex]\delta[/tex] for some [tex]\delta[/tex] > 0 and try to show that there exists a [tex]\epsilon[/tex] > 0 such that |t1 - t2| < [tex]\epsilon[/tex]. I didn't know where to go after this, so I tried the sequence definition for continuity and I got nowhere.

Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use monotone to prove it's one-to-one. Use the Intermediate Value Theorem to prove it's onto.
 
By "monotone" do you mean strictly monotone? (x < y implies f(x) < f(y))? If so it's trivial, but if not then I don't think you'll be able to prove this. E.g.

f(x) = 0 for x in [0, 1/2) and = 2(x - 1/2) otherwise.
 
Perhaps you need to add the hypothesis f is dffble?
 
Thanks. But I also need a little help with showing that the inverse function is also continuous.
 
What class is this for? The fact that the continuous image of a compact set is compact coupled with the Heine-Borel theorem is the super easy way to conclude that [tex]H[/tex] is closed/open, so [tex]H^{-1}[/tex] is continuous.

That seems like it might be too fancy for your class, though. Disregard if you don't know what I'm talking about.

You can show directly that the image of an open set is open, just using the definition of monotone and continuity. More explicitly, consider the image of an open interval, given that the map is continuous - it's the same as showing that it's onto, except replace 0 and 1 with different values.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K