Monte Carlo neutron slab model

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on developing a Monte Carlo code for simulating monoenergetic neutrons in a one-dimensional steady state slab geometry. Participants explore the calculation of neutron flux and current, comparing Monte Carlo results to deterministic models, and addressing challenges related to normalization and source strength.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to calculate neutron flux and current in a Monte Carlo simulation and is unsure how to normalize results for comparison with deterministic models.
  • Another participant suggests dividing results by the number of particles to obtain values per particle and mentions the need for a conversion factor for source strength to the number of particles.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about deriving the conversion factor for source strength and how to relate it to the deterministic equations, particularly regarding the number of particles produced by a unit source.
  • One participant questions the definition of source strength, recalling it as the number of neutrons typically represented by an energy spectrum.
  • A participant provides a link to a resource that may assist with the simulation process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the normalization process or the definition of source strength, indicating multiple competing views and unresolved questions regarding the comparison between Monte Carlo and deterministic methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the appropriate scaling factor for comparing Monte Carlo results to deterministic models, and the discussion includes unresolved definitions and assumptions related to source strength and particle statistics.

The_shadow
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

Trying to write a simple Monte Carlo code for mono energetic neutrons in a steady state slab geometry in one-dimension. Their is an incident source on the left hand side of the slab and its of length L.

I understand how to work out the path length and scattering angles based on the pseudo-random numbers, as well as the type of scattering the particle undergoes, however I wish to calculate the flux and current and compare it to the deterministic model. I'm struggling to find much on this topic (that's useful).

For example the deterministic solutions for flux and current depend upon the source term (directly proportional), by contrast the Monte Carlo depends upon the initial numbers of particles, and a sufficiently large number is required to get good statistics - so presumably some scaling/normalization is required to compare directly to the deterministic equations? anyone know what that scaling factor is?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Divide by the number of particles in the Monte Carlo to get results per particle. You should have a conversion factor for source strength to number of particles.
 
Hi Mathman! many thanks, I'm working on an Event-based Monte Carlo code - i.e the tracking of individual particles in a medium so I'm not sure where/how I derive the conversion factor for source strength to number of particles in order to compare it to the deterministic equations.

For example the current at a given surface is just the sum of net particles passing through that particular surface divided by the surface area and the flux is just the sum of track lengths divided by the volume of the element. The number of particles needs to be high enough (millions) to get good statistics - however that makes the flux and current completely arbitrary so how exactly would one compare this to the standard analytical solution for a neutron diffusion in a slab? i.e say:

{d^2\phi(x) \over d x^2} -\Sigma_a\Sigma_t\phi(x) + S = 0

Where S is the incident source. This source would produce N particles say, but given a source of say unity, what is N? Many thanks again,
 
What is your definition of source strength? When I was working in this area (a long time ago), the source strength was simply the number of neutrons, usually in the form of an energy spectrum.

Note:the equation looks like a Latex expression, without saying Latex.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
988
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K