What is the percentage reduction in the solar constant due to a large sunspot?

In summary: In both cases, what are the total luminosities (sun+spot)? You have the formulae, just plug the appropriate numbers...Sun: Luminosity: Spot: Sun: Luminosity: Spot: In summary, a large sunspot with an apparent diameter of 100,000 km forms on the photospheric disk of the Sun. Its effective temperature is 1700 K cooler than the surrounding photosphere which has an effective temperature of 5700 K. This results in a reduction in the solar constant, measured at the Earth, of about 17%.
  • #1
stunner5000pt
1,461
2
A large sunspot with an apparent diameter of 100,000 km forms on the photospheric disk of the Sun. Its effective temperature is 1700 K cooler than the surrounding photosphere which has an effective temperature of 5700 K.

(a) Calculate the percentage reduction in the solar constant, measured at the Earth, as a result of this sunspot. Use a solar photosphere radius of 7x10^5 km.


in this case the energy emanated by the sun is the
total area of the photosphere x [tex] \sigma T^4 [/tex]
to get the usual solar consant we simply divide by 4
the change in the solar constant would be to subtract the deficit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
stunner5000pt said:
in this case the energy emanated by the sun is the
total area of the photosphere x [tex] \sigma T^4 [/tex]

Yes, that's the luminosity.
to get the usual solar consant we simply divide by 4

Why do you divide by four? You want the relationship that takes you from luminosity to flux.
the change in the solar constant would be to subtract the deficit?

The "percentage reduction" probably refers to:

[tex]100 \times \frac{\Delta f}{f}[/tex]

where [itex]\Delta f[/itex] is difference between the usual solar constant (flux) and that with the sunspot.
 
  • #3
im not quite sure what the relationship between luminosity and flux is ... is it
energy radiated by teh sun/the total area of the sphere that encompasses the space between the sun and the earth?
[tex] \frac{\pi R_{photosphere}^2 \sigma T^4}{4 \pi (R_{sun} + 1AU)^3} [/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #4
stunner5000pt said:
im not quite sure what the relationship between luminosity and flux is ... is it
energy radiated by teh sun/the total area of the sphere that encompasses the space between the sun and the earth?

That's right. Your formula isn't quite right, though...

[tex] \frac{\pi R_{photosphere}^2 \sigma T^4}{4 \pi (R_{sun} + 1AU)^3} [/tex]

In the numerator, what is the area of the surface of the sun? Is it a circle or a sphere? In the denominator, are you sure that's the proper area for a sphere? Also, how does Rsun compare to 1 AU?
 
  • #5
OOPS
i got mixed between volume and area (dont know why i was thiking volume)

also Rsun << 1 AU so
[tex] \frac{4\pi R_{photosphere}^2 \sigma T^4}{4 \pi (R_{sun} + 1AU)^2} [/tex]
[tex] \frac{R_{photosphere}^2 \sigma T^4}{(1 AU)^2} [/tex]
ok that gives the solar constant

the flux due to the sun is now the area of hte sun less the area oh the spot. But the area of the sun is 100 times that of the are of the spot...
flux due the circular spot
the attached diagram is what i have in mind
the length of the arc of the sun is diamater of the sunspot
the the length of the arc near Earth is the diameter of the area where the solar energy is distributed.
 

Attachments

  • charge.JPG
    charge.JPG
    8.6 KB · Views: 436
  • #6
is that correct now?? Also could you have a look at the other thread where the photn flux has to be determined? MY prof gave us a rough idea
 
  • #7
stunner5000pt said:
is that correct now??

I don't know, it says the figure hasn't been approved.
 
  • #8
it has now!
that figure would be in 3d however.. would be a cone ?
could we simply use similar triangles here? in taht the square of corresponding radii of the circles is propertional to the areas of the circles?
 
  • #9
stunner5000pt said:
that figure would be in 3d however.. would be a cone ?
could we simply use similar triangles here? in taht the square of corresponding radii of the circles is propertional to the areas of the circles?

That sounds right, though you may be overcomplicating a bit. Why don't you write your work out in equation form, it will be easier to check that you're on the right track.
 
  • #10
ok so
[tex] \frac{7 x*10^5 km}{100 000 km} = \frac{1 AU}{r} [/tex]
now that we have the area of the curlce of the big cone and that hte energy emanated is the same for both the circles
[tex] \rho_{sunspot} A_{sunspot} = \rho_{big circle} A_{big circle} [/tex]

nowwe know the density of the energy reachng the earth. This is delta f? th susual flux ,f is 1380 W/m^2 ?
 
  • #11
Let's approach this a different way. Find the percentage reduction in total light emitted from the sun. How does this relate to the solar constant?
 
  • #12
im afriad you've lost me on taht one ... what do you mean?
 
  • #13
stunner5000pt said:
im afriad you've lost me on taht one ... what do you mean?

With the sunspot present, the sun will emit less light. This is what causes the reduction in the solar constant. Can you explain why the sunspot results in a reduction of luminosity?
 
  • #14
well the sun will emit less radiation on account of this low temperature spot.

so what is the difference delta f...
it would simply be the luminosity of the spot itself?
 
  • #15
stunner5000pt said:
so what is the difference delta f...
it would simply be the luminosity of the spot itself?

In both cases, what are the total luminosities (sun+spot)? You have the formulae, just plug the appropriate numbers into them.
 
  • #16
te question refers to disc rather than the sun's surface so i am using pi r^2 rather than 4 pi r^2
luminosity of the spot
[tex] \pi * (50000 * 10^3)^2 * \sigma * 4000^4 = 1.1 * 10^{23} W [/tex]
luminosity of the sun
[tex] \pi * (7 * 10^8)^2 * \sigma * 5700^4 = 9.3 * 10^{25} W[/tex]
dividing both of these by the the area of a hemisphere (2 pi AU^2) will yield the flux we want
delta f is calculated by the flux of the spot - flux of sun

the answer is supposed to be in th vicinity of less than 5%
 
Last edited:
  • #17
is that correct now? I am simply taking the irradiance of the spot and the irradiance of the sun. Thus to find delta f we simply subtract the two and divide by the sun's irradiance and that solves our problem?

also i must thank you for your patience... sometimes i say silly things or i overcomplicate things (like here).

thanks a lot spacetiger!
 
  • #18
The luminosity of the different regions of the sun will depend on the surface area at the sun, not the apparent surface area on the sky. Your calculation for the spot should be roughly correct, since the spot is much smaller than radius of curvature of the sun and would therefore be roughly circular. The sun, however, is a sphere and the surface of a sphere is not [itex]\pi r^2[/itex].

Remember that this is just the first step. You will eventually need to find the flux at the earth. Technically, the problem doesn't give enough information for you to do this because it doesn't tell you how the spot is oriented relative to us. However, you should probably assume that it's right in the middle of the disk.
 
  • #19
so the flux is to divide the irradiance by the quantity
4 pi AU^2 right?
i mean photon flux is given is W/m^2 isn't it ?
 
  • #20
stunner5000pt said:
so the flux is to divide the irradiance by the quantity
4 pi AU^2 right?
i mean photon flux is given is W/m^2 isn't it ?

For the entire sun, yes. For the spot, you can use the cone approximation you were using before.
 

FAQ: What is the percentage reduction in the solar constant due to a large sunspot?

What is the solar constant?

The solar constant is a measure of the amount of solar radiation that reaches the Earth's surface per unit area. It is approximately 1361 watts per square meter.

How does the solar constant affect Earth's climate?

The solar constant plays a significant role in regulating Earth's climate. Changes in the solar constant can lead to changes in temperature, weather patterns, and ocean currents.

What factors can impact the solar constant?

The solar constant can be affected by changes in the distance between the Earth and the Sun, as well as variations in the Sun's energy output due to solar activity.

How is the solar constant measured?

The solar constant is measured by satellites that orbit the Earth and collect data on the amount of solar radiation reaching the Earth's surface. These measurements are then used to calculate the solar constant.

What are the potential benefits of harnessing solar energy from the solar constant?

Harnessing solar energy from the solar constant can provide a renewable and clean source of energy. It can also reduce our dependence on fossil fuels and help mitigate the effects of climate change.

Similar threads

Back
Top