Most probable and average value of a function

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the most probable and average energy of a neutron from a fission reaction using a specific energy spectrum function. The most probable energy is found by taking the derivative of the function and solving for its zeros, leading to a numerical solution around 0.7. The average energy calculation involves integrating the function, which presents challenges due to the complexity of the integral. Participants discuss methods for integrating by parts and utilizing the error function to simplify the calculations. Ultimately, they confirm that the integration process requires careful substitutions and the use of known mathematical functions for accurate results.
Grogs
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
I've been asked to find the most probable and average energy of a neutron produced in a fission reaction. The neutron energy spectrum is represented by this function:

<br /> \chi (E) = 0.453 e^{-1.036E} \sinh(\sqrt{2.29E})<br />

The first part, finding the most probable energy, seems fairly straightforward: take the derivative of the function and find the zeros - one of these zeros will be the peak of the curve, and thus the most probable energy:

\frac{d}{dE} \chi (E)

I ended up with:

\frac{d}{dE} \chi (E) = 0.453[-1.036 e^{-1.036E} \sinh(\sqrt{2.29E}) + \frac{E^{-0.5}}{2} \sqrt{2.29} cosh(\sqrt{2.29E}) e^{-1.036E}]

which, by setting it equal to zero and manipulating, I end up with:

\tanh(1.513 \sqrt{E}) = \frac{0.7303}{\sqrt{E}}

I can solve for E numerically by trying different values of E, and indeed I come up with the correct answer (~0.7) I'm just curious if it's possible to solve for E directly in this case.


The 2nd part of the problem, finding the average energy, is giving me more trouble. The average energy should be:

\overline{E} = \int \limits_{0} ^ {\infty} E \chi (E) \ dE

or

\overline{E} = 0.453 \int \limits_{0} ^ {\infty} E e^{-1.036E} \sinh(\sqrt{2.29E}) \ dE

My problem is that I can't figure out how to integrate this equation. When I try to integrate by parts, any value I choose for u and dv yields another integral that needs to be integrated by parts, which yields another etc. Can anyone give me advice on how to solve this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You want to integrate something like:

\int_0^{\infty} x e^{-x} \sinh(2a \sqrt{x} ) dx

Right? (the two is for later) So there will be two similar terms when you expand out the sinh. I'll only do one of them, but the other is basically the same (and I'll ignore constants that go out front):

\int_0^{\infty} x e^{-x} e^{2a \sqrt{x}} dx = \int_0^{\infty} x e^{-x+2a \sqrt{x}} dx

Now use the substitution u2=x, 2udu = dx:

\begin{align*} \int_0^{\infty} u^3 e^{-u^2+2 a u} du &amp;= e^{a^2} \int_0^{\infty} u^3 e^{-u^2+2 a u-a^2} du \\<br /> &amp;=e^{a^2} \int_0^{\infty} u^3 e^{-(u-a)^2} du \end{align*}<br />

At this point you can make the substitution t=u-a and expand out the (t+a)3. The odd powers of t can be integrated exactly, but for the others you'll need to look up the error function if you don't know it already. There are no exact values for their integrals on this region (-a to infinity), but there are plenty of tables you can find aproximations in. And no, your first equation has no closed form solution.
 
Last edited:
StatusX:

Thanks, that's exactly what I needed. The odd values of t indeed appear easy enough to solve by making another substitution: s=t^2 I am having a bit of trouble with the even one, and I suspect it's my unfamiliarity with the error function. For example, with the integral of the form:

\int t^2 e^{-t^2}\ ds

Given that the error function is defined as:

erf(z) = \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}} \int \limits_{0} ^ {z} e^{-t^2} \dt

then

\int \limits_{0} ^ {z} e^{-t^2} \dt = \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2} erf(z)

so integrating by parts, letting u=t^2 and dv = e^{-t^2} dt, I end up with:

\frac{\sqrt{\pi}*t^2}{2} erf(z) -2 \int t e^{-t^2} \dt

I can solve the right half using the substitution s=t^2 which reduces to:

\frac{\sqrt{\pi}*t^2}{2} erf(z) + e^{-t^2}

Does that look right?
 
Last edited:
The way you did it, there should be an erf inside the second integral. I think a better way to do it is to use u=t dv=t e^{-t^2} dt, so that:

\int_0^{z} t^2 e^{-t^2} dt = -\frac{1}{2}z e^{-z^2}+\frac{1}{2}\int_0^{z} e^{-t^2} dt
 
Last edited:
OK, that does it. Thanks for the help.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K