A Motion of a spring that has mass

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the equations of motion for a spring with a uniform mass distribution at time t=0. The initial approach involves modeling the system using discrete springs connected to masses and results in a second derivative equation for motion. The conversation then shifts to a continuous model, defining local tension and mass distribution along the spring using material coordinates. A force balance equation is established to relate tension changes to the acceleration of the mass elements. A relevant open-access paper is provided for further reading on the topic.
jaumzaum
Messages
433
Reaction score
33
Hello!

I was trying to find the equations of motion for a spring with uniform distribution of mass (uniform just in t=0, because after a while the distribution will be non-uniform).
I tried to attack this problem first in the discrete (non-continuous) way:

"Consider N springs with elastic constant k joining N masses m. Find the acceleration of the i-th mass over time)".

Then I found the following equation for the motion:

$$k(x_{i+1}-2x_{i}+x_{i-1})=ma_{i}$$
I know the first term seems like a second derivative, however I was not able to either solve this system nor extrapolate that in the continuous way.
Can you guys help me with this problem (for example, trying to help me to find the equations of motion or showing me any paper or website that explains how to find them)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The mass distribution remains uniform provided us specify location using a material (body) coordinate.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Chestermiller
Following up on what Dr. D said, let L be the unstretched length of the spring, and let s be a material coordinate that runs from s = 0 at one end of the spring to s = L at the other end of the spring. Also, let x(s,t) be the location at time t of the material element situated at material location s along unstretched configuration of the spring. Then based on this, the local tension T in the spring at material location s and time t is given by $$T(s,t)=kL\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}-1\right)$$ Also, the mass between material locations s and ##s+\Delta s## is given by: $$\rho \Delta s$$ where ##\rho## is the linear density of the unstretched spring. So a force balance on a short section of the spring between material coordinates s and ##s+\Delta s## becomes: $$T(s+\Delta s,t)-T(s,t)=\rho \Delta s\frac{\partial ^ 2x}{\partial t^2}$$
 
Last edited:
Thread 'The rocket equation, one more time'
I already posted a similar thread a while ago, but this time I want to focus exclusively on one single point that is still not clear to me. I just came across this problem again in Modern Classical Mechanics by Helliwell and Sahakian. Their setup is exactly identical to the one that Taylor uses in Classical Mechanics: a rocket has mass m and velocity v at time t. At time ##t+\Delta t## it has (according to the textbooks) velocity ##v + \Delta v## and mass ##m+\Delta m##. Why not ##m -...