Motion of a wire in a magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
When a wire carrying current is placed in a uniform magnetic field, it experiences a force defined by F=I(lxB). This force is always perpendicular to both the magnetic field and the current direction. As a result, the motion of the wire is straight rather than circular. The perpendicular nature of the force means that, without constraints, the wire will move in a straight line. Thus, the motion of the wire in a magnetic field is characterized as straight motion.
eoghan
Messages
201
Reaction score
7
Hi there!
If a wire is surrounded by a uniform magnetic field B, then there is a force F=I(lxB). By this force, what is the motion of the wire? Is it a circular motion or a straight motion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The force, from Lorentz law, as you have written, is always perpendicular to both the magnetic field and to the current in the wire. Without costraints, the motion is also perpindicular to the wire, so it is straight motion.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Back
Top