Motion of an aircraft in ground

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rajeshmarndi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aircraft Ground Motion
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the principles governing the motion of an aircraft on the ground compared to a spacecraft in empty space. It examines the role of Newton's third law and the interaction between the aircraft and air, as well as the implications of thrust and pressure in both scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the principles of motion for an aircraft on the ground are similar to those of a spacecraft in space, particularly regarding the role of air and thrust.
  • One participant suggests that the aircraft's forward motion is due to Newton's third law, where air is propelled backward, creating a reaction that moves the aircraft forward.
  • Another participant argues that at the molecular level, air cannot "suck" the aircraft forward, emphasizing that it is a matter of momentum conservation and Newton's third law.
  • There is a suggestion that the creation of low pressure ahead of the aircraft by the propeller could contribute to its forward motion, but this is contested by others who focus on the push from air molecules.
  • Some participants clarify that in space, a rocket's motion is entirely due to internal forces, with the momentum of the rocket and its spent fuel being conserved.
  • One participant raises a question about the possibility of throwing something in empty space, seeking clarification on whether external forces are necessary for such an action.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the similarities between aircraft and spacecraft motion, with some emphasizing the role of air and thrust for aircraft, while others highlight the unique conditions of space. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact nature of forces involved in both scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference different levels of modeling (molecular vs. macroscopic) and the implications of thrust and pressure without reaching a consensus on the underlying principles.

rajeshmarndi
Messages
319
Reaction score
0
is the principle how an aircraft move ahead in ground similar to how a spacecraft moves ahead in empty space?

in the ground air is propelled backward and in space since it has no air, small explosion pushes the spacecraft ahead.
Newtons third law.

i understand in the case of spacecraft , as there is no other object to exert force on spacecraft , it has to be Newtons third law. But not sure of aircraft movement on ground just by propelling air fastly backward, the aircraft moves ahead. As there is air to interact with the aircraft.

So is it just the Newtons third law as in space or there is a force exerted by the air on the aircraft to moves ahead as an action-reaction due to the aircraft thrust on the air.

Or bcoz an low pressure is created ahead of the aircraft by the propeller, the aircraft is sucked forward.

Note: I'm not asking how lift is produced by the wing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rajeshmarndi said:
So is it just the Newtons third law as in space or there is a force exerted by the air on the aircraft to moves ahead as an action-reaction due to the aircraft thrust on the air.

Or bcoz an low pressure is created ahead of the aircraft by the propeller, the aircraft is sucked forward.
On the moelcular level there is no "sucking by under-pressure". Air molecules cannot "pull" but only "push". On this level it is simply Newtons 3rd Law or momentum conservation.

But there are to many molecules to deal with them on the macroscopic scale, so pressures are introduced as a coarser statistical model.

It is not about one or the other cause, but different levels of modeling the same thing.
 
if the air pushes the aircraft forward, then both case cannot be similar( spacecraft in space) if I'm right as in space nothings pushes the spacecraft , there is no external force in space.
 
rajeshmarndi said:
is the principle how an aircraft move ahead in ground similar to how a spacecraft moves ahead in empty space?

in the ground air is propelled backward and in space since it has no air, small explosion pushes the spacecraft ahead.
Newtons third law.

i understand in the case of spacecraft , as there is no other object to exert force on spacecraft , it has to be Newtons third law. But not sure of aircraft movement on ground just by propelling air fastly backward, the aircraft moves ahead. As there is air to interact with the aircraft.

So is it just the Newtons third law as in space or there is a force exerted by the air on the aircraft to moves ahead as an action-reaction due to the aircraft thrust on the air.

Or bcoz an low pressure is created ahead of the aircraft by the propeller, the aircraft is sucked forward.

Note: I'm not asking how lift is produced by the wing.

It's just Newton's Third law and the Conservation of Momentum Law in both cases...and it doesn't require anything to push against. It's the force from the fuel that's being burned that creates the forward motion due to the opposite reaction on the aircraft/spaceship.

Have a read here for more basic information:
http://mechanical-physics.suite101.com/article.cfm/basic_physics_of_rocket_propulsion

CS
 
Last edited by a moderator:
An aircraft's thrust device accelerates the surrounding air backwards relative to the aircraft.

A rocket accelerates part of it's own mass.
 
is it possible to throw something away in empty space while floating Or an external force or support or explosion like a gun shot is required to throw something away.
 
rajeshmarndi said:
is it possible to throw something away in empty space while floating Or an external force.
In the case of a rocket, it's all internal. Ignoring gravity, once a rocket is in space, it's all internal forces. The velocity of the center of mass of the rocket and spent fuel never changes, momentum of rocket and it's spent fuel is conserved. Spent fuel is accelerated in one direction, the rocket accelerated in the opposing direction, all due to internal forces.
 
i understand the above.
but what abt "is it possible to throw something away in empty space?"

or should i post it in a new thread.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
9K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K