Motion of Charged Particles in E&B Fields

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the motion of charged particles in electric and magnetic fields, specifically focusing on a system involving a cylindrical anode and cathode. The problem requires finding the least potential difference needed for thermal electrons to reach the anode without initial velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the derivation of equations related to the potential difference and the conditions under which electrons travel from the cathode to the anode. There are attempts to clarify the correctness of expressions involving logarithmic terms and their implications on the final answer.

Discussion Status

Some participants express confusion regarding the correctness of their answers and the derivation steps. There is a mix of agreement and disagreement about the presence of a square on the logarithmic term in the equations. Guidance has been offered regarding the need to check the derivation steps and the application of conservation of energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention using different coordinate systems, such as Cartesian and cylindrical, and express uncertainty about solving the equations completely. There is also a note about the original poster feeling stumped and considering revisiting the problem later.

PumpkinCougar95
Gold Member
Messages
63
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


Problem Statement: A system consists of a long cylindrical anode of radius a and a coaxial cylindrical cathode of radius b (b < a). A filament located along the axis of the system carries a heating current I producing a magnetic field in the surrounding space. Find the least potential difference between the cathode and anode at which the thermal electrons leaving the cathode without initial velocity start reaching the anode.

Homework Equations



F = m dv/dt = q( E + v x B )

The Attempt at a Solution


What I have tried: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1sLIz7ZsUwS0wkBW4iGEXWJBrxCenahKs

Ans..jpeg

In the last step, I forgot to put a square on the log() term. But what I have written is given as the correct answer. I do not understand what I have done wrong. Help, please?
 

Attachments

  • Ans..jpeg
    Ans..jpeg
    49 KB · Views: 438
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, and welcome to PF!

Why do you think you've made a mistake?
 
The answer I got is not correct. Apart from that, I don't really understand.
 
PumpkinCougar95 said:
The answer I got is not correct. Apart from that, I don't really understand.
In your first post you said that what you had written gives the correct answer. Here you are saying you did not get the correct answer. So, I'm a little confused.
Your answer in the first post looks correct to me (except for possibly a sign issue).
 
Oh sorry for the misunderstanding. In the last step I wrote, you can see I missed a square sign on the log() term from my previous line. What I meant was that the correct answer doesn't have a square on the log() term.
 
I think the correct answer should have a square on the log term.
 
But here it doesn't have a square...

https://drive.google.com/open?id=150Xo6D7BZjyYOkX3oiMmyqtbWZdhIVGA
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1RFOoNg3Pk5N35cuZ9o_Wv5ugz3aMfgIW
 
upload_2018-2-23_16-34-13.png

In deriving the second equation from the first equation above, you should get a square on the log term.
[EDIT: The first equation above should have a square on the log in the second term on the right side. The answer for V in the second equation should also have a square on the log.]
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-2-23_16-34-13.png
    upload_2018-2-23_16-34-13.png
    5.3 KB · Views: 370
Last edited:
Yes, i got it. Thanks for your help!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny
  • #10
  • #11
I think you would only need to solve the Fz equation to get the answer, so it doesn't make any difference whether you use cylindrical or cartesian coordinates.

I have no idea on how to solve these equations completely.
 
  • #12
But if you know ##V_z## you can apply conservation of energy between r=a and r=b. See my first post.
 
  • #13
I'm deleting all my files for this thread because I'm stumped! :H May revisit later.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K