MHB Motion of Particles in Uniform Gravitational Field

AI Thread Summary
Two particles in a uniform gravitational field move horizontally with initial velocities of 3 m/s and 4 m/s in opposite directions. Their vertical components of velocity increase due to gravity, and they become perpendicular after a time \( t \) calculated as \( t = \frac{\sqrt{v_1 v_2}}{g} \). The horizontal distances covered by each particle during this time are \( x_1 = v_1 t \) and \( x_2 = v_2 t \). The total separation between the particles when their velocities are perpendicular is given by \( x_1 + x_2 = (v_1 + v_2) \frac{\sqrt{v_1 v_2}}{g} \). This analysis provides a clear understanding of the motion of particles in a uniform gravitational field.
DrunkenOldFool
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Two particles move in a uniform gravitational field with an acceleration $g$. At the initial moment the particles were located at one point and moved with velocities $v_1 = 3 \text{ms}^{-1}$ and $v_1 = 4 \text{ms}^{-1}$ horizontally in opposite directions. Find distance between the particles when their velocities become mutually perpendicular.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
DrunkenOldFool said:
Two particles move in a uniform gravitational field with an acceleration $g$. At the initial moment the particles were located at one point and moved with velocities $v_1 = 3 \text{ms}^{-1}$ and $v_1 = 4 \text{ms}^{-1}$ horizontally in opposite directions. Find distance between the particles when their velocities become mutually perpendicular.
The two horizontal components of velocity are constant, and the vertical components are always equal. Now draw a velocity diagram for when the two velocities are perpendicular, and solve the diagram for the vertical component of velocity (it should come to \(2 \sqrt{3}\) m/s if my scratch algebra and arithmetic are correct).

Now you can find the time \(t\) it took the vertical component to reach this value, and the separation is \(7t\) m.

CB
 
Last edited:
Let the velocities of the particles (say $\vec{v_{1}}'$ and $\vec{v_2 }'$) become perpendicular after time $t$. By equation of motion,

$$ \vec{v_{1}'}=\vec{v_{1}}+\vec{g}t \\ \vec{v_{2}'}=\vec{v_{2}}+\vec{g}t$$

As $\vec{v_1 ' }$ and $\vec{v_2 '}$ are perpendicular, we can write

$$ \begin{align*} \vec{v_1 ' } \cdot \vec{v_2 ' } &=0 \\ (\vec{v_{1}}+\vec{g}t) \cdot (\vec{v_{2}}+\vec{g}t) &= 0 \\ -v_1 v_2 +g^2 t^2 &=0 \\ t &= \frac{\sqrt{v_1 v_2}}{g}\end{align*}$$

Let $x_1$ and $x_2$ be the horizontal distances covered by particles 1 and 2 in time $t$ respectively. Note that the acceleration in horizontal direction is zero.

$$x_1 = v_1 t = v_1 \frac{\sqrt{v_1 v_2}}{g} \\ x_2 = v_2 t = v_2 \frac{\sqrt{v_1 v_2}}{g}$$

The total separation between the particles is

$$x_1+x_2= (v_1+v_2)\frac{\sqrt{v_1 v_2}}{g}$$
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is my try.

View attachment 277

considering the triangle $ABC$,

$$\begin{align*}
\alpha &=90^\circ - \beta \\
\tan{\alpha} &= \tan (90^\circ -\beta ) \\
\tan{\alpha} &= \cot \beta \\
\frac{gt}{v_1}&=\frac{v_2}{gt}\\
g^2t^2 &=v_1\times v_2\\
\therefore t &= \frac{\sqrt{v_1v_2}}{g} \qquad since \; t>0 \\ \end{align*}

$$

the rest is as same as sbhatnagar's
 

Attachments

  • projectile.png
    projectile.png
    2 KB · Views: 110
Thank You!:)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top