MHB Motion of Particles in Uniform Gravitational Field

DrunkenOldFool
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Two particles move in a uniform gravitational field with an acceleration $g$. At the initial moment the particles were located at one point and moved with velocities $v_1 = 3 \text{ms}^{-1}$ and $v_1 = 4 \text{ms}^{-1}$ horizontally in opposite directions. Find distance between the particles when their velocities become mutually perpendicular.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
DrunkenOldFool said:
Two particles move in a uniform gravitational field with an acceleration $g$. At the initial moment the particles were located at one point and moved with velocities $v_1 = 3 \text{ms}^{-1}$ and $v_1 = 4 \text{ms}^{-1}$ horizontally in opposite directions. Find distance between the particles when their velocities become mutually perpendicular.
The two horizontal components of velocity are constant, and the vertical components are always equal. Now draw a velocity diagram for when the two velocities are perpendicular, and solve the diagram for the vertical component of velocity (it should come to \(2 \sqrt{3}\) m/s if my scratch algebra and arithmetic are correct).

Now you can find the time \(t\) it took the vertical component to reach this value, and the separation is \(7t\) m.

CB
 
Last edited:
Let the velocities of the particles (say $\vec{v_{1}}'$ and $\vec{v_2 }'$) become perpendicular after time $t$. By equation of motion,

$$ \vec{v_{1}'}=\vec{v_{1}}+\vec{g}t \\ \vec{v_{2}'}=\vec{v_{2}}+\vec{g}t$$

As $\vec{v_1 ' }$ and $\vec{v_2 '}$ are perpendicular, we can write

$$ \begin{align*} \vec{v_1 ' } \cdot \vec{v_2 ' } &=0 \\ (\vec{v_{1}}+\vec{g}t) \cdot (\vec{v_{2}}+\vec{g}t) &= 0 \\ -v_1 v_2 +g^2 t^2 &=0 \\ t &= \frac{\sqrt{v_1 v_2}}{g}\end{align*}$$

Let $x_1$ and $x_2$ be the horizontal distances covered by particles 1 and 2 in time $t$ respectively. Note that the acceleration in horizontal direction is zero.

$$x_1 = v_1 t = v_1 \frac{\sqrt{v_1 v_2}}{g} \\ x_2 = v_2 t = v_2 \frac{\sqrt{v_1 v_2}}{g}$$

The total separation between the particles is

$$x_1+x_2= (v_1+v_2)\frac{\sqrt{v_1 v_2}}{g}$$
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is my try.

View attachment 277

considering the triangle $ABC$,

$$\begin{align*}
\alpha &=90^\circ - \beta \\
\tan{\alpha} &= \tan (90^\circ -\beta ) \\
\tan{\alpha} &= \cot \beta \\
\frac{gt}{v_1}&=\frac{v_2}{gt}\\
g^2t^2 &=v_1\times v_2\\
\therefore t &= \frac{\sqrt{v_1v_2}}{g} \qquad since \; t>0 \\ \end{align*}

$$

the rest is as same as sbhatnagar's
 

Attachments

  • projectile.png
    projectile.png
    2 KB · Views: 107
Thank You!:)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top