Simulating Robot Motion in Water: Forces & Models

  • Thread starter Thread starter sirt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Water
AI Thread Summary
To simulate a robot moving in water, key forces to consider include gravitational force acting downward, buoyancy acting upward, viscous drag opposing motion, and the force exerted by the robot to propel itself. A simple model can be developed by calculating these forces to determine the net force acting on the robot during movement. It is important to note that turbulence is neglected in this scenario, as the water is assumed to be static. Understanding these forces will enable accurate simulation of the robot's motion in water. This foundational knowledge is crucial for effective modeling and simulation of aquatic robotic systems.
sirt
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am trying to simulate a robot moving in water.
I need to determine exactly what forces will act on the robot from the water (bouyancy is obvious, and understood).
I need a simple model that will enable me to compute what force the water will exert on the robot, when one of its parts move.
(I neglect turbulence in the water. Also, the water is static, not flowing!)
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The forces acting on you robot will be:
1. Gravitational (vertically downward)
2. Bouyancy (vertically upwards)
3. Viscous drag ( opposite to the direction of motion)
4. Force, your robot will apply to move.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top