Motor calculation for a rotating platform

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculations and considerations for selecting a motor for a rotating platform designed to support a load of 2000kg. Participants explore the necessary calculations for angular velocity, moment of inertia, torque, and power requirements, as well as the effects of friction and rolling resistance on the motor's performance.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their calculations for angular velocity and moment of inertia, questioning the low power and torque results and the application of rolling resistance.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of friction in determining motor power requirements, noting that friction is difficult to calculate and often determined experimentally.
  • There is a discussion about the connection of the motor to the platform, with concerns raised about the direct connection to a heavy load and its implications for motor longevity.
  • A suggestion is made to consider using a capstan wheel turntable to improve efficiency and ease of startup from rest.
  • Participants discuss the coefficient of friction, with skepticism about the initial value provided and the importance of considering materials and arrangements.
  • One participant mentions using caster wheels to support the structure and hold the turntable up, indicating a design choice.
  • There is a recommendation for the team to seek local advisor support for detailed guidance on their project.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the calculations and design considerations, particularly regarding the effects of friction, the appropriateness of motor connection methods, and the selection of materials. No consensus is reached on the best approach or the accuracy of the calculations presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of calculating friction and the potential variability in coefficients based on materials. There are also unresolved questions regarding the arrangement and number of caster wheels, which could impact the overall design and calculations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and hobbyists involved in mechanical design projects, particularly those focused on motor selection and rotational mechanics.

Mrhohoho
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
Hi! My team and i have been stuck in this school project for awhile. Been reading up a lot but can't find the answer.

We have been designing and rotating platform that is able to rotate a load of 2000kg. So the rotating platform would something similar to those car turntables where there would be caster wheels below it. We have made a few calculations but not so sure are we correct. The calculations are to determine what type of motor should we use. The diameter of the rotating platform is around 2m.

The time taken to turn one round is 30s and we calculated our angular velocity and angular acceleration using the formula (2 pi / T) and (w / t.) But based on my understanding, we have to calculate the moment of inertia which is 1/2mr^2 because we are assuming to be rotating a solid cylinder. From the moment of inertia, we calculate the torque required which is T = I * angular acceleration. Then Power = Torque * angular velocity. The power and torque required is quite low and we find it weird. I know there is rolling resistance but not so sure where to apply it.

However, we are not so sure whether that during constant speed, is there any calculation need to be done?

Hope the people here could help us as our project deadline is approaching...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I hope the forum can help you with your project.

Mrhohoho said:
The power and torque required is quite low and we find it weird. I know there is rolling resistance but not so sure where to apply it.

However, we are not so sure whether that during constant speed, is there any calculation need to be done?

Yes indeed, the key factor is friction. Once the object has finished accelerating and moves at a constant rotation rate, all of the motor power goes toward overcoming friction (and air drag which is a kind of friction). Friction is very difficult to calculate. It is usually determined by experiment.

So you need a motor powerful enough to overcome friction. Then you need some extra power to accelerate it from a stop. That is were moment of inertia comes in. But another big factor is how fast must it accelerate from a stop to the final speed?

Different motor types have different relationships between starting torque and torque at rated speed.

How is your motor connected to the platform? Does it drive the central shaft, or does it contact the outside perimeter of the platform?

Motors are relatively inexpensive. That suggests it is not so bad to add a motor several times bigger than you think you need. Is it a quality measure of the project to find a motor exactly matched to the minimum needed?
 
Thank you for the quick reply!

The motor shaft would be directly connected in the center. I believe the formula for friction would be Fr = coefficient x mg(?). The coefficient of friction i see for rolling friction should be around 0.001?

So safe to say that during constant speed, the force to overcome would be friction and air drag? My team would probably state negligible air drag and give a safety factor of 3?
 
And also is my calculation for the first part somehow correct? Like am i in the right direction? I believe all my formulas during acceleration would be under uniform circular motion.
 
Mrhohoho said:
...
The motor shaft would be directly connected in the center.

Direct connection of an electrical motor to a to-be-rotated-from-repose 2-ton mass seems to me not to be a great idea regarding the longevity of that motor, even if VFD is used.
 
You may want to consider a capstan wheel turntable. For example, vinly record turntables use them as in the picture. The advantage is that the electric motor can run at much higher RPM than the turntable. Motors are more efficient at higher RPM. Also, startup from a complete stop is easier with a capstan.

The capstan wheel on the motor shaft, can either touch the turntable as in this picture.

1649174634303.png


Or the motor shaft can drive a belt that goes around the turntable as in this picture.
1649174764382.png


The coefficient of friction is highly dependent on materials and on arrangements. For example, it is easier to slide on ice than on concrete. So, I would be skeptical that the first value you found, 0.001 was the correct value.
What about bearings? Might you have ball bearings, or thrust bearings to hold the turntable up?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and Lnewqban
Hi Thanks for the reply! Would be using caster wheels to support the structure and hole the turntable up!
 
Mrhohoho said:
Hi Thanks for the reply! Would be using caster wheels to support the structure and hole the turntable up!
That's good.

Another question, Do you have a local advisor to help you? We can help a little bit here, but that is no substitute for an advisor in the room with you to help with the many small details. For example, with castors, How many? How are they arranged?

Ask the organizers to assign advisors to the teams.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K