Motorcycle physics -- Countersteering and Bodysteering

  • Thread starter Thread starter Erunanethiel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motorcycle Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on motorcycle physics, specifically the concepts of countersteering and bodysteering. Participants explore the mechanics of how a rider's weight shift affects the motorcycle's center of gravity and lean angle, particularly in scenarios involving real-world friction and tire dynamics. Key insights include the effectiveness of bodysteering as a method to initiate turns without relying solely on countersteering, especially in emergency situations where rider tension can hinder performance. The conversation also references Reg Pridmore's CLASS schools and Keith Code's "No BS" sportbike, highlighting the practical applications and limitations of these steering techniques.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of motorcycle dynamics and physics
  • Familiarity with countersteering and bodysteering techniques
  • Knowledge of motorcycle geometry, including rake and trail
  • Experience with weight shifting during cornering
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of motorcycle lean angles and center of gravity
  • Study the differences between countersteering and bodysteering
  • Explore Reg Pridmore's CLASS schools for advanced riding techniques
  • Investigate the design and functionality of Keith Code's "No BS" sportbike
USEFUL FOR

Motorcycle enthusiasts, riding instructors, and anyone interested in improving their riding skills or understanding the physics behind motorcycle maneuvering.

  • #61
rcgldr said:
I don't think there is a reliable way to do this. Again, using the bike on a tight wire comparison, the long balance pole weighs more than the bike, in order to maintain balance on such a system.
As long as there is friction between the road and tires, it is very unlikely that bike's movement will completely cancel out rider's movement one way or the other, the hard but I think is which way that will be
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #62
rcgldr said:
I don't think there is a reliable way to do this. Again, using the bike on a tight wire comparison, the long balance pole weighs more than the bike, in order to maintain balance on such a system.

Erunanethiel said:
As long as there is friction between the road and tires, it is very unlikely that bike's movement will completely cancel out rider's movement one way or the other, the hard but I think is which way that will be
What I meant is that the rider ends up leaning the wrong way after the initial application of force. However, once gravity takes over and causes the system to continue to fall, the rider can then lean the correct way since that won't prevent the system form continuing to fall.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Erunanethiel
  • #63
rcgldr said:
What I meant is that the rider ends up leaning the wrong way after the initial application of force. However, once gravity takes over and causes the system to continue to fall, the rider can then lean the correct way since that won't prevent the system form continuing to fall.
Oh what you said is there is not a reliable way to push the bike and then the rider ending up leaning the same way the system is turning to right? The rider can shift his weight to offset the center of mass of the system horizontally with a bike with no trail, but he would end up leaning the wrong way is what you are saying, have I got it right?
 
  • #64
Erunanethiel said:
Oh what you said is there is not a reliable way to push the bike and then the rider ending up leaning the same way the system is turning to right? The rider can shift his weight to offset the center of mass of the system horizontally with a bike with no trail, but he would end up leaning the wrong way is what you are saying, have I got it right?
The rider initially ends up leaning the wrong way, but once the system is leaning, then gravity becomes the dominant factor, and the rider can then lean the correct way, since the rider's movements won't be enough to prevent the system from continuing to fall over, at which point steering inputs will be needed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Erunanethiel
  • #65
rcgldr said:
The rider initially ends up leaning the wrong way, but once the system is leaning, then gravity becomes the dominant factor, and the rider can then lean the correct way, since the rider's movements won't be enough to prevent the system from continuing to fall over, at which point steering inputs will be needed.
So the bottom line on this thread is that, it is possible to change the horizontal position of the center of mass of the system with body weight shifts on a bike with no trail geometry, but you would need to "catch" the bike through handlebar inputs to stop the bike from falling. I guess if you confirm what I said is the case, we can call it done!
 
  • #66
Erunanethiel said:
So the bottom line on this thread is that, it is possible to change the horizontal position of the center of mass of the system with body weight shifts on a bike with no trail geometry, but you would need to "catch" the bike through handlebar inputs to stop the bike from falling. I guess if you confirm what I said is the case, we can call it done!
Correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Erunanethiel

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K