Mousetrap Car Energy efficiency

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JLT
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the energy efficiency of mousetrap cars, exploring how to define and calculate "useful" energy in this context. Participants examine the relationship between potential energy, kinetic energy, and the factors that contribute to the car's motion, including translational and rotational energy. The conversation touches on theoretical considerations, practical applications, and the subjective nature of defining efficiency.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that energy efficiency can be calculated as 100 times the final maximum translational energy of the car divided by the initial potential energy in the mousetrap spring.
  • Others argue that the final rotational energy of the wheels should also be considered when calculating energy efficiency.
  • A participant suggests that the placement of the mousetrap affects the car's movement, as the center of mass of the trap moves towards the bait, potentially advancing the car further.
  • There is a discussion about what constitutes "useful" energy, with some suggesting that it depends on the criteria for evaluation, such as top speed versus distance traveled.
  • One participant questions the existence of a definitive definition of "useful" energy, noting that it is application-dependent.
  • Another participant highlights the relevance of load in practical transport situations, mentioning that energy efficiency can be affected by tare weight in vehicles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on what constitutes "useful" energy and how to measure energy efficiency, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion acknowledges that definitions of "useful" energy may vary based on the specific application or context, and that there may be no universally accepted standard for measuring energy efficiency in mousetrap cars.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to educators, students, and hobbyists involved in physics projects, particularly those related to energy efficiency and mechanical systems.

JLT
Messages
60
Reaction score
9
TL;DR
define "useful" energy of a car.
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1.

If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured.

If energy efficiency is defined by starting energy → useful energy, would you agree that "useful" for a car is just the translational motion of the car going forward (not rotating tires or internal inertia etc. calculations). For a simple calculation, would you agree the energy efficiency of a mousetrap car would simply be 100 X final maximum translational energy of the car divided by initial PE in the mousetrap spring?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JLT said:
TL;DR: define "useful" energy of a car.

For a simple calculation, would you agree the energy efficiency of a mousetrap car would simply be 100 X final maximum translational energy of the car divided by initial PE in the mousetrap spring?
That would seem to be correct, but don't forget the final rotational energy of the wheels.

When the trap is sprung, the centre of mass of the trap moves towards the bait. You need to place the trap on the car so that the bait end of the trap is at the back, as that will further advance the car along the track, by the distance the centre of mass of the trap moves.
 
Baluncore said:
That would seem to be correct, but don't forget the final rotational energy of the wheels.

When the trap is sprung, the centre of mass of the trap moves towards the bait. You need to place the trap on the car so that the bait end of the trap is at the back, as that will further advance the car along the track, by the distance the centre of mass of the trap moves.

Yes the wheels are rotating and lever arm might still be moving - but the main goal is just the car going forward - what is "useful" is the car going forward however that happens. I guess for semi-trucks/trains - what is really "useful" is the load they carry traveling - not even the mass of the truck/train, but just use the mass of the load?

I admit I tried AI with this question, and it kept trying to add in energy of all the pieces moving, when I really think that is not the "useful" part. Is there a definitive definition of what "useful" energy is when it comes to energy efficiency?
 
I think what "useful" is depends on your metric for "good". For example, if you are being judged on top speed then the KE of the car is the only thing that is useful. But if you're being judged on distance travelled, rotational KE of the wheels is useful too because it's energy that needs to be dissipated to bring the car to a stop.

You may find that energy efficiency isn't quite the thing you want to know. If you're being judged on distance then energy may be dissipated from different "stores" at different rates, and the same nominal efficiency may produce different performances.

So the first question is: what is "good" for you?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JLT and DaveE
Ibix said:
So the first question is: what is "good" for you?

Haha - just checking if there was any industry standard (or if I'm justified on grading/teaching projects based purely on my own personal opinion on what "good" is) - I thought teaching STEM over lib arts would be less subjective ;) - still happy I'm not teaching gov or hist classes haha.
 
JLT said:
Is there a definitive definition of what "useful" energy is when it comes to energy efficiency?
Of course not. It's completely application dependent.

But if it is for a competition or grading a school project, then it doesn't matter what definition you use, as long it's stated clearly in the beginning, not decided post-hoc after the tests.
 
JLT said:
Yes the wheels are rotating and lever arm might still be moving - but the main goal is just the car going forward - what is "useful" is the car going forward however that happens.
What are the rules for this competition? Are you talking about mousetrap cars that use an extended lever arm and string wrapped around an axle? Are oversize wheels allowed?

1765383748609.webp


 

Attachments

  • 1765383764780.webp
    1765383764780.webp
    11.3 KB · Views: 7
JLT said:
what is really "useful" is the load they carry traveling
Very relevant in practical transport situations. mpg is very much affected by Tare Weight. Most of the energy for a passenger train is used just to get the loco and coaches from A to B.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
14K
  • · Replies 169 ·
6
Replies
169
Views
15K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K