Mousetrap Car Energy efficiency

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JLT
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 2K views
JLT
Messages
62
Reaction score
9
TL;DR
define "useful" energy of a car.
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1.

If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured.

If energy efficiency is defined by starting energy → useful energy, would you agree that "useful" for a car is just the translational motion of the car going forward (not rotating tires or internal inertia etc. calculations). For a simple calculation, would you agree the energy efficiency of a mousetrap car would simply be 100 X final maximum translational energy of the car divided by initial PE in the mousetrap spring?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JLT said:
TL;DR: define "useful" energy of a car.

For a simple calculation, would you agree the energy efficiency of a mousetrap car would simply be 100 X final maximum translational energy of the car divided by initial PE in the mousetrap spring?
That would seem to be correct, but don't forget the final rotational energy of the wheels.

When the trap is sprung, the centre of mass of the trap moves towards the bait. You need to place the trap on the car so that the bait end of the trap is at the back, as that will further advance the car along the track, by the distance the centre of mass of the trap moves.
 
Baluncore said:
That would seem to be correct, but don't forget the final rotational energy of the wheels.

When the trap is sprung, the centre of mass of the trap moves towards the bait. You need to place the trap on the car so that the bait end of the trap is at the back, as that will further advance the car along the track, by the distance the centre of mass of the trap moves.

Yes the wheels are rotating and lever arm might still be moving - but the main goal is just the car going forward - what is "useful" is the car going forward however that happens. I guess for semi-trucks/trains - what is really "useful" is the load they carry traveling - not even the mass of the truck/train, but just use the mass of the load?

I admit I tried AI with this question, and it kept trying to add in energy of all the pieces moving, when I really think that is not the "useful" part. Is there a definitive definition of what "useful" energy is when it comes to energy efficiency?
 
I think what "useful" is depends on your metric for "good". For example, if you are being judged on top speed then the KE of the car is the only thing that is useful. But if you're being judged on distance travelled, rotational KE of the wheels is useful too because it's energy that needs to be dissipated to bring the car to a stop.

You may find that energy efficiency isn't quite the thing you want to know. If you're being judged on distance then energy may be dissipated from different "stores" at different rates, and the same nominal efficiency may produce different performances.

So the first question is: what is "good" for you?
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JLT and DaveE
Ibix said:
So the first question is: what is "good" for you?

Haha - just checking if there was any industry standard (or if I'm justified on grading/teaching projects based purely on my own personal opinion on what "good" is) - I thought teaching STEM over lib arts would be less subjective ;) - still happy I'm not teaching gov or hist classes haha.
 
JLT said:
Is there a definitive definition of what "useful" energy is when it comes to energy efficiency?
Of course not. It's completely application dependent.

But if it is for a competition or grading a school project, then it doesn't matter what definition you use, as long it's stated clearly in the beginning, not decided post-hoc after the tests.
 
JLT said:
Yes the wheels are rotating and lever arm might still be moving - but the main goal is just the car going forward - what is "useful" is the car going forward however that happens.
What are the rules for this competition? Are you talking about mousetrap cars that use an extended lever arm and string wrapped around an axle? Are oversize wheels allowed?

1765383748609.webp


 

Attachments

  • 1765383764780.webp
    1765383764780.webp
    11.3 KB · Views: 21