Battery energy efficiency and Coulombic efficiency - what are they?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the concepts of battery energy efficiency and coulombic efficiency, particularly in the context of home energy storage solutions. A coulombic efficiency of 96% indicates that from 100 Wh of energy input, only 96 Wh is usable upon discharge. Energy efficiency varies significantly, with one battery exhibiting 90% efficiency and another at 60%, highlighting the impact of charge and discharge C-rates on overall energy loss. The conversation emphasizes that energy efficiency ratings should ideally specify the C-rate to provide a clearer understanding of performance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of battery terminology, including coulombic efficiency and energy efficiency
  • Familiarity with charge and discharge C-rates in battery performance
  • Knowledge of resistive losses in electrical systems, particularly I²R losses
  • Basic concepts of voltage differentials in battery charging and discharging
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the relationship between charge/discharge C-rates and battery energy efficiency
  • Explore the effects of resistive losses on battery performance in detail
  • Learn about different battery chemistries and their typical efficiency ratings
  • Investigate standards for reporting energy efficiency in battery systems
USEFUL FOR

Homeowners considering battery storage solutions, energy efficiency analysts, and electrical engineers focused on optimizing battery performance.

Rich76
Messages
27
Reaction score
2
I'm looking at two different batteries for home energy storage. Both batteries have a coulombic efficiency in the upper nineties, say 96%. One battery has an energy efficiency of 90%, and the other has an energy efficiency of 60%. I believe both ratings represent loses of usable energy, but I don't understand entirely.

If I understand correctly, a coulombic efficiency of 96% means that if I charge a battery with 100 Wh of energy, I'll only get 96 Wh of usable energy on discharge..? Now, energy efficiency confuses me the most. I've read that it has to do with the charge and discharge C-rate. I'm assuming greater C-rates lead to greater potential for energy loss. But, how can a battery have for example a 60% efficiency rating if you don't know the C-rate? It would seem energy efficiency ratings would look like this instead: 60% @ 0.5C. Unless, there's a standard C-rate when one isn't shown..?

Lastly, a 60% energy efficiency rating seems awfully low, am I really losing 40% of energy?Thanks for any help, and sorry for my lack of education.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think you mean charge rate when you say C-rate.

Think of resistive losses when charging a battery. At constant voltage, energy accumulates in proportion to current I, but losses occur proportional to I2.

If someone gives an energy efficiency without specifying charge rate, they are presuming a standard charge rate without saying so.

The possible range of energy efficiencies is 0% to almost 100%.

For home use, cost, size, weight, lifetime, storage duration, and fire hazard may be more important to you than energy efficiency.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and Rich76
From the internet, coulombic efficiency or Faraday efficiency is the energy lost when electrons or ions participate in unwanted reactions, or if the electrolytic products are allowed to recombine.

The other losses in batteries are I2R (current dependent, ie charge/discharge rate) and voltage losses, ie to charge a cell you need to apply more voltage than the cell voltage, then to discharge the load voltage must be less than the cell voltage, this voltage differential is a loss in the system.

So energy efficiency is all of the losses put together and is heavily dependent on charge/discharge rate.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Rich76

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 117 ·
4
Replies
117
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K