Moving along a current carrying conductor

  • Thread starter Thread starter quawa99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conductor Current
AI Thread Summary
Moving in the direction of electron drift in a current-carrying conductor alters the observer's frame of reference, affecting perceived current and charge densities. If the observer moves at the drift velocity, electrons appear stationary while ions move oppositely, maintaining the current. At speeds close to light, both electrons and ions appear to move backward, necessitating the use of Lorentz transformations to analyze the four-current. The current density increases by a factor of gamma, but length contraction balances this, keeping total current constant. Observers should focus on the frame of reference rather than personal movement to simplify the analysis.
quawa99
Messages
67
Reaction score
2
What will happen if I move in the direction of drift of the electrons in a current carrying conductor?
What would happen if my speeds are equal to the drift velocity and in a second case close to the speed of light
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lets say the electrons are moving at v in the conductor frame and the ions are not moving. If you move at v, then the electrons are not moving in your frame, but the ions are moving at -v, so the current is the same.

If you move near the speed of light, then both electrons and ions are moving backwards in your frame of reference at close to the speed of light. It is necessary to transform the 4-current, which is
##J^\alpha = (c \rho, j)##

What is the four-current in the frame moving at v/2?
Assume total charge in this frame is 0.
The current is -nv/2 - nv/2
so the four-current is
##J_1 = (0, -nv)##

Let u = your velocity relative to the frame moving at v/2.
Using Lorentz transformation,
##J_2 = (\gamma uvn/c, \gamma nv)##

The current density is much greater in your frame, by a factor of ##\gamma##, and there is a charge density as well. But the length of the conductor will also be contracted by a factor of ##\gamma##, so the total current is the same. In this frame, there will be an electric field as well as a magnetic field.

You can look at it two ways. The electric field arises from a Lorentz transformation of the magnetic field in the original frame. Or the electric field arises from the charge which results from a Lorentz transformation of the current in the original frame. Same thing.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Put it simpler:

Since the drift velocity is typically much smaller than lightspeed in the frame of the wire, you wouldn't see big effects from the difference between the speeds (moving charges and wire) in your frame.

The usual way to treat these problems is to model the wire as two lines of charges... decide on a frame of reference and the charge densities in that frame.

Very important - if "you" are the observer, do not talk about "you" moving.
Everything else is moving. "You" are always stationary.

Reword the question with these things in mind and you should find it easier to cope with.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top