Moving car hits a stationary car

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsman2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physics of a moving car colliding with a stationary car, focusing on the conservation of momentum. When the two cars become attached post-collision, the final velocities of both cars are equal, but their momenta may differ due to varying masses. The conservation of momentum is mathematically expressed as m1u1 + m2u2 = m1v + m2v, where v is the common final velocity. The analysis confirms that the final velocity of the moving car decreases while the stationary car's velocity increases.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly momentum.
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation of equations.
  • Knowledge of mass and velocity relationships in collisions.
  • Ability to interpret and apply the conservation of momentum principle.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of elastic and inelastic collisions in physics.
  • Learn about momentum conservation in multi-object systems.
  • Explore real-world applications of momentum conservation in automotive safety.
  • Investigate the effects of varying mass on collision outcomes using simulations.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching momentum concepts, and automotive engineers interested in collision dynamics.

physicsman2
Messages
139
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If a moving car hits a stationary car and they become attached how would the velocity change for both cars


Homework Equations




3. The Attempt at a Solution [/b
I believe that the moving cars velocity will decrease and the stationary cars velocity will increase so that the momentum of both cars is equal
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I suspect you are making the assumption that the masses of the cars are equal. Conservation of momentum holds and you can derive an expression that will give you the tangled mess in terms of the initial velocity(s) and masses.
 


Hi physicsman2, well you are pretty much right, you correct identified that the velocity of the moving car would decrease and the the velocity of the stationary car would increase, however you second comment you made about them having the same momentum isn't necessarily correct as consider each car may have a different mass. If they had different masses but had equal momentum then their velocities would not be equal, but that obviously can't be true as they are attached to one another, so they must have the same velocity, and that is the distinction you need to make clear to yourself, there velocities would be the same but not necessarily their momentum if their masses are not equal.

So that's a qualitative answer that you gave, but it might be easier to approach it from a mathematical perspective. So let's first set up our scenario, we have car 1 of mass m1, which is traveling with initial velocity u1 . We then have a stationary car, well call car 2 of mass m2, which may or may not be the same as the mass of car 1, and car 2 has initial velocity u2 which as it is stationary equals 0. so let us put this all into an equation which describes how momentum is conserved. I do apologise if you haven't learn't this concept yet. So the equation describing the conservation of momentum:

m_1 u_1 + m_2 u_2 = m_1 v_1 + m_2 v_2

where v1 is the final velocity of car 1 and v2 is the final velocity of car 2. now v1 = v2 as we established earlier, so we will call this common final velocity v. so inputing this and our previous properties into the equation we get:

m_1 u_1 + m_2 (0) = m_1 v + m_2 v
m_1 u_1 = m_1 v + m_2 v

now what is already evident is that the speed of car 2 has increase, but can we show from this equation the the speed of car 1 has decreased, well we have to be able to show that v < u1, so:

m_1 u_1 = m_1 v+ m_2 v
u_1 = v\left( \frac{m_1 + m_2}{m_1}\right)

now hopefully it should be clear that the fraction involving the masses must be greater than one as all the masses are positive, this therefore must mean that v < u_1. :D

I hope that helped, you initial answer was correct, but you simply made assumptions about the situation which were not necessarily correct :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
57
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K