Multidimensional time simulation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of digitally simulating a spacetime with multiple time dimensions, questioning the implications and challenges of such a concept. While it is technically possible to modify the metric signature to include more than one time dimension, significant issues arise, particularly regarding the fundamental nature of time and its one-way characteristic. Participants suggest that each object could have its own time based on relative speed, but this approach does not truly add a new time dimension; it merely assigns a specific meaning to coordinate time. The conversation also touches on faster-than-light frames of reference, emphasizing that changing the metric signature through coordinate choices does not alter the inherent nature of spacetime dimensions. Overall, the idea remains largely theoretical and speculative, with no practical modeling or analysis established in current physics.
DyerMaker
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Can multidimensional time be simulated with a computer?
If there are computer simulations of four-dimensional space are there any possibilities to digitally simulate a space -time with time having more than one dimension?
Please, leave some related links, if possible.
 
Technology news on Phys.org
It's easy enough to add a second minus to the metric signature. However, a lot of important features of time (like the one-way nature) stem from there being only one minus sign in the metric, so it probably won't behave like a spacetime, just a rather odd space. And linking it to any physics would be difficult because that isn't the way the world works.

What do you want to do? To just muck around with the tensors Maxima can do the job, and probably SymPy if you're more into python.
 
You can implement anything on a computer you can write down on a pad of paper. I think the tricky bit here is to decide what goes on that pad of paper.
 
I found this article on Relativistic Mechanics and Multiple Time Dimensions

https://www.researchgate.net/public...ivistic_mechanics_in_multiple_time_dimensions

one question I have is what does it mean to have multiple time dimensions? What do you envision?

One possible scheme would be each object would have its own time based on its speed relative to other objects. Viewing a collection of objects then one could assign a clock to each one that represents the time that object is traversing due to its relative speed from a particular vantage point.

As an example, particles traveling from deep space to the Earth would have differing speeds and hence differing lifetimes like muons. You could model that.

Another place where multi time dimensions come into play is in faster than light frames of reference where you have three time-like dimensions and one space-like dimension. One could perhaps model that to understand what we might see. If we were observing a faster than light particle.

Programming languages that could be used would be python, Java, C/C++, Fortran or Julia/ Matlab. All of these languages have third party libraries and frameworks to do modeling and simulations of systems described by differential equations.

As an example in the past, Ive used Open Source Physics and Java to do modeling of orbital systems.

Www.compadre.org/osp
 
jedishrfu said:
I found this article on Relativistic Mechanics and Multiple Time Dimensions

https://www.researchgate.net/public...ivistic_mechanics_in_multiple_time_dimensions
I don't think that's a good reference (and researchgate is known for questionable papers).

jedishrfu said:
one question I have is what does it mean to have multiple time dimensions?
The definition of that in the paper you referenced is that the "fifth dimension" is the Minkowski interval ##ds^2##, so if ##ds^2## is timelike, the paper says there are "two time dimensions". Which is nonsense.

jedishrfu said:
One possible scheme would be each object would have its own time based on its speed relative to other objects. Viewing a collection of objects then one could assign a clock to each one that represents the time that object is traversing due to its relative speed from a particular vantage point.

As an example, particles traveling from deep space to the Earth would have differing speeds and hence differing lifetimes like muons. You could model that.
This isn't adding another time dimension. It's just picking a particular coordinate chart and assigning a special meaning to its coordinate time--in other words, LET. (Which is off limits for discussion at PF.)

jedishrfu said:
Another place where multi time dimensions come into play is in faster than light frames of reference where you have three time-like dimensions and one space-like dimension.
No, you don't. You can't change the metric signature of spacetime by choosing coordinates. You can have a coordinate chart that has three timelike and one spacelike basis vector (in fact you can have one that has four timelike basis vectors), but that doesn't change the nature of the dimensions of spacetime. It just means you've picked a coordinate chart that will be very difficult to work with (since the metric will look very complicated in it--none of the basis vectors are orthogonal, there will be cross terms all over the place, and you won't be able to read off anything useful from the line element).
 
A sci-fi example of a universe with two time dimensions is Greg Egan's Dichronauts:

https://www.gregegan.net/DICHRONAUTS/DICHRONAUTS.html

Egan does quite a bit of math for the basis of this universe, but it's still sci-fi, not an actual physics proposal. AFAIK nobody has ever tried to actually do a detailed analysis of the physical implications outside of Egan's novels.
 
Dear Peeps I have posted a few questions about programing on this sectio of the PF forum. I want to ask you veterans how you folks learn program in assembly and about computer architecture for the x86 family. In addition to finish learning C, I am also reading the book From bits to Gates to C and Beyond. In the book, it uses the mini LC3 assembly language. I also have books on assembly programming and computer architecture. The few famous ones i have are Computer Organization and...
I have a quick questions. I am going through a book on C programming on my own. Afterwards, I plan to go through something call data structures and algorithms on my own also in C. I also need to learn C++, Matlab and for personal interest Haskell. For the two topic of data structures and algorithms, I understand there are standard ones across all programming languages. After learning it through C, what would be the biggest issue when trying to implement the same data...
Back
Top